skip to main | skip to sidebar
Reflective Online Teaching
My Personal Site for Reflective Teaching
RSS
    Jonathan Acuña Solano, Post Author
    Contact Email: jonacuso@gmail.com

Showing posts with label Qualitative Research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Qualitative Research. Show all posts

Misconceptions of Plagiarism

Academic Research, Mixed-Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Quantitative Research, Research 0 comments

Taken from http://billmuehlenberg.com/2014/04/08/on-christian-plagiarism/

Misconceptions of Plagiarism

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña-Solano
School of English
Faculty of Social Sciences
Universidad Latina de Costa Rica
Friday, March 5, 2016
Post 229

         “As a researcher, it is important to understand the impact of validity and reliability and to be able to determine whether your research as well as others’ research is valid and reliable” (Laureate Education, 2015). Nevertheless, one other factor that can affect how valid and reliable a research project is 100% linked to plagiarism, which “is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward” (What is plagiarism?, n.d.). It is for this reason, as stated by Laureate Education (Inc., 2015), “committing plagiarism –whether by accident or purposely- is a serious form of dishonesty and has severe repercussions for academic researchers.”

         “Although researchers can turn to guidelines and regulations for help in dealing with some of the ethical concerns likely to emerge in a case study” (Merriam, 1991), or in any other form of academic inquiry, “the burden of producing a study that has been conducted and disseminated in an ethical manner lies with the individual investigator” (Merriam, 1991). Plagiarism can have its bad repercussions in the validity and credibility of data analyzed for an academic research project; it can have an ulterior effect on the trustworthiness linked to an individual researcher who, by making trite mistakes, uses information wrongly to validate his/her findings.

         “Many people think of plagiarism as copying another’s work or borrowing someone else’s original ideas. But terms like ‘copying’ and ‘borrowing’ can disguise the seriousness of the offense” (What is plagiarism?, n.d.). Researchers may find beneficial data for his/her paper among another author’s findings or recommendations; the problem is that a direct quotation or paraphrase is not credited to the original writer becoming all of this section of the paper an ethical violation. “Researchers may copy complete or partial text from another source as long as quotation marks are placed around the original text followed by a citation to the resource and reference to the resource included in the bibliography or reference section” (Inc., Ethics in Research, 2013). The absence of any reference to the source becomes an unmindful act of plagiarism.

         What are other forms of plagiarism that must be avoided by any researcher? For Plagiarism.Com (What is plagiarism?, n.d.), there are six types of plagiarism that a researcher needs to stay away from, let us take a look at them: 1) “turning in someone else’s work as your own,” 2) using the same exact “words and ideas” from an author failing to give proper credit to his/her work, 3) “failing to put a quotation in quotation marks,” 4) providing the wrong reference in regards to the “source of quotation,” 5) “changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit,” and 6) using excessive “words and ideas” from a source and literally making it the most part of your project with or without credit to the author. Any of these four types of mistakes in one’s writings can make us researchers fall into a kind of fraud that will undermine our investigative projects.


Taken from http://news.milne-library.org/2013/01/

         Among the most common misconceptions regarding plagiarism are the ones in direct connection with images, videos and music. “Using an image, video or piece of music in a work you have produced without receiving proper permission or providing appropriate citation is plagiarism” (What is plagiarism?, n.d.). All of us in the world of academic inquiry need to be aware that using a photograph or a scan of a copyrighted photograph is a violation. “Re-creating a visual work in the same medium” or “re-creating a visual work in a different medium” (What is plagiarism?, n.d.) is also an example of plagiarism. And what about “re-mixing or altering copyrighted images, videos or audio, even if done so in an original way” (What is plagiarism?, n.d.)? No doubt it is another form of plagiarizing someone else’s work and authorship.

         “While this is a breach of research ethics, it unfortunately occurs and in many cases is a result of misconceptions about plagiarism” (Inc., Journal 4: Misconceptions of Plagiarism, 2015). All of us in the world of academic research must be in the lookout to avoid making mistakes that can take us into any form of plagiarism. As a matter of academic and professional integrity, it is our duty to create a sort of checklist that can help us track whether what we are doing with information is or is not making us fall into plagiarism.

References


Laureate Education, Inc. (2013). Ethics in Research. Retrieved from Faculty Development: https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/bbcswebdav/institution/LPS1/FD/.pdf
Laureate Education, Inc. (2015). Journal 4: Misconceptions of Plagiarism. Retrieved from Faculty Development: http://global3.laureate.net/#/home/faculty
Laureate Education, Inc. (2015). Blog 4: The Validity and Reliability of Research. Retrieved from Laureate Faculty Development: https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_85522_1&content_id=_190137_1&mode=reset
Merriam, S. (1991). Case Study Research in Education, A Qualitatiave Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

What is plagiarism? (n.d.). Retrieved from Plagiatism.Com: http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/


Friday, March 04, 2016



Reliability and Validity in Research

Academic Research, Mixed-Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Quantitative Research, Research 0 comments

Taken from http://readingcraze.com/index.php/reliability-validity-research/

Reliability and Validity in Research

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña-Solano
School of English
Faculty of Social Sciences
Universidad Latina de Costa Rica
Thursday, March 3, 2016
Post 228

         “Have you ever read an article that made you think, ‘How did they come to that conclusion?’ Or one that made you think, ‘How is that accurate?’ or ‘What data supports their findings’” (Laureate Education, 2015). If “research is systematic inquiry” (Merriam, 1991), then one –as a researcher- can start a project to validate other authors’ conclusions, refute or agree with the accuracy in their studies, and gather more data that can support their findings, too. A twofold way to ascertain the truth about research discoveries is by means of validity and reliability.

         “The principles of validity and reliability are fundamental cornerstones of the scientific method. Together, they are the core of what is accepted as scientific proof” (Validity and Reliability, n.d.). Validity can be characterized as the unit of measurement in research that helps the investigator a) to design the process of inquiry and b) to decide how the results are analyzed. For Laureate Education (2015), “valididy is defined as the degree to which a test, study, or instrument measures what it is intended to measure. Validity is concerned with the study’s success in measuring what the researchers intended to measure.” Validity, then, “encompasses the entire experimental concept and establishes whether the results obtained meet all the requirements of the scientific research method” (Validity and Reliability, n.d.). Validity in qualitative research, e.g., can be attained by means of triangulation, and in quantitative research, through the stability of data and its replicability of the experiment.

         What about reliability? “The idea behind reliability is tht any significant results must be more than a one-off finding and be inherently repeatable” (Validity and Reliability, n.d.). Other inquiriers must be able to carry out basically the same kind of experimentation, under the same repeatable conditions, to come up with “indentical” results. For Laureate Education (2015), reliability needs to be “defined as the extend to which an experment, survery, observation, test, or any other measuring procedure consistently produces the same results.” Thus, “when conducting research, it is essential to consider whether the data sources as well as conclusions are valid and reliable” (Laureate Education, 2015). As Merriam (1991) has posited it, “every researcher wants to contribute knowledge that is believable and trustworthy.” If both conditions are met, the researcher then is bound to have a valid and reliable research project with valid and reliable measurements, findings, and conclusions.

         Since it has been my concern of how feedback is carried out in higher education in the ELT Program Universidad Latina has, I have been closely paying attention to an article writen by Nicol, Thomson, & Breslin (2014), who carried out a study on how peer feedback in the UK. To show the authors’ validity and reliability in their study, we will examine certain areas pertaining both constructs regarding believability and trustworthiness.

For Nicol, Thomson, & Breslin (2014), “peer review is a reciprocal process whereby students produce feedback reviews on the work of peers and receive reviews from peers on their own work.” What did the authors do to achieve both reliability and validity in their study?

1)   The authors stated the importance of their research question using relevant and current research as support, all of this coming from their literature review that was carried out chronologically.
2)   The writers described how their study was conducted and included a vast array of descriptions of the students who got involved in their study, the kinds of resources that they employed, the assessment instruments applied to the participants, the method used to collect their data, and how all this information was analyzed.
3)   The essayists reported results in a responsible and ethical fashion. Though no real statement of personal biases held by the three authors, individually or collectively, are mentioned, findings are presented without deviating from their research question.
4)   The writers came up with sound conclusions based on their research findings and pointed out other areas of potential research studies in the future.

Though this may sound as a trite exercise for a new researcher, As a simplistic exercise prior to writing a research proposal, it is always a sensible endeavor to view in detail how experienced researcher present their projects of inquiry. Nicol, Thomson, & Breslin’s (2014) research project is a good example to follow when consider publishing your findings. No doubt that there are many more samples that can be retrieved from recent publications that can be used as a way to compare, in terms of research structure, what you are doing. May all of us interested in research get to find the best model and methodology to explain what happens in our teaching surroundings.

References


Laureate Education, I. (2015). Blog 4: The Validity and Reliability of Research. Retrieved from Laureate Faculty Development: https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/webapps/blackboard/content/
Merriam, S. (1991). Case Study Research in Education, A Qualitatiave Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review persptective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
Validity and Reliability. (n.d.). Retrieved from Explorable.Com: https://explorable.com/validity-and-reliability


Thursday, March 03, 2016



Benefits and Challenges of Research Methods

Academic Research, Mixed-Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Quantitative Research, Research 0 comments


Benefits and Challenges of Research Methods

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña-Solano
School of English
Faculty of Social Sciences
Universidad Latina de Costa Rica
Friday, February 26, 2016
Post 222

         “Can you imagine using the same methodology for every study you conduct?” (Laureate Education, Faculty Development, 2015). This is simply out of question; all research projects have individual and unique characteristics that cannot account for the usage of the very same methodology and in the very same way. Using the same methods “is unlikely because your research questions may change over time, pushing you to select a different research method” (Laureate Education, Faculty Development, 2015). Additionally, it needs to be considered the fact that all fields of study do have different conceptualizations in their research projects; it is not the same kind of project in the hard sciences than in the social sciences.

         “As a researcher, it is important that you understand and consider the benefits and challenges associated with different research methodologies” (Laureate Education, Faculty Development, 2015). If your objective is to test hypotheses by examining cause and effect or even measuring the range of frequency of a phenomenon in the hard sciences (biology, medicine, etc.), a quantitative methodology is the most advisable for a research project. As stated by Laureate Education (Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research, 2015), this will involve “a large number of respondents who are typically randomly selected.” If your research aims at examining issues and understanding phenomena to explore the individuals’ perceptions and attides (like in the social sciences), a qualitative research project is at hand. A project like this in the social domanin “involves a small number of participants or focus groups who are consciously selected” (Laureate Education, Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research, 2015) And if you want to really understand phenomena more thoroughly, perhaps a mixed methods approach is the one needed. This choice will focus on research that “includes multiple objectives with an emphasis on examining real-life contexts, gaining multiple perspectives, and understanding cultural influences” (Laureate Education, Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research, 2015).

         In a previous piece of reflective journaling, I was considering the following research question: “How can peer assessment in blended learning scenarios benefit language learners in public speaking and pronunciation acquisition?” In hindsight, I can still recall the words of my research mentor, Dr. Rafael Espinoza, that there exist research questions that can be approached from several investigative flanks. A question like this one can probably be researched from various methodological paths.

Research Method
Pros
Cons
Quantitative Approach
Generalizable results can be applied to various groups of individuals to obtain similar concluding hypotheses (Laureate Education, Academic Research, 2013). Peer assessment can come out of the study as a type of evaluation that can yield very positive effects in student learning.
A research project in this area of blended learning scenarios will indeed need a huge sample of individuals to get those generalizable results that account for big groups of individuals.
Qualitative Approach
“The basic generation of meaning is always social, arising in and out of interaction with a human community” (Creswell, 2003). Then, peer assessment can be qualified as a possible learning method for public speaking in blended learning scenarios.
“The process of qualitative research is largely inductive, with the inquirer generating meaning from the data collected in the field” (Creswell, 2003). If you as a researcher are not comfortable in spotting commonalities emerging from your data, this approach is not then for you.
Mixed Methods
By combining both approaches, from the quantitative stand, the researcher gains “a large amount of data that can be easily organized and manipulated into reports for analysis” (Qualitative and quantitative research for small business, n.d.) to predict behavior concerning peer assessment. From the quantitative stand, you can sense the emotional reactions that students have towards the use of peer assessment in a virtual environment.
Though the amount of participants is not as large as a quantitative research per se, it is always difficult to find language students ready to participate in a research project. Not knowing how to tabulate information within, i.e., Microsoft Excel can be a problem for a neophyte researcher. (This also applies to Quantitative Research.) Moreover, the writing of the right questions to ask and explore students’ feelings towards peer assessment beyond the class boundary is a challenge.

Based on this quick analysis of the three possible ways of giving some sense to the above research question, a mixed method of inquiry is a good choice to see how individuals see this change in their public speaking instruction and react to peer assessment provided by means of a blended teaching/learning scenario.

         If a mixed method of inquiry is chosen, what are the potential benefits of this methodology? As specified by Creswell (2003) puts it when talking about a sequential tranformative design in mixted methods of inquiry, and for this particular research question on peer assessment, “either qualitative or quantative data may be collected first” (Harwell, 2011). Data concerning peer assessment in blended education can be analyzed separately, and “the findings are integrated during the interpretation phase” (Harwell, 2011) to better comprehend what the statistical data and the commanalities spotted during the analysis of data reveal about the phenomenon in question.

         The one main challenge that I can detect in a research project like this is the way in which data can be collected. Likert scales questionnaries with open-ended questions, plus the observation of individuals in a blended context, are ways to triangulate the information and mitigate any problem. The other one challenge could be the time requited to analyze data conscentiously, but this can be done as time allows the researcher to do so. Some sort of agenda of data analysis needs to be proposed and followed.

References


Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://ucalgary.ca/paed/files/paed/2003_creswell_a-framework-for-design.pdf

Harwell, M. (2011). Research Design in Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods. In C. Conrad, & R. Serlin , The Sage handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry (pp. 147-182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.in/upm-data/41165_10.pdf

Laureate Education, I. (2013). Academic Research. Retrieved from Faculty Development: https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/bbcswebdav/institution/LPS1/

Laureate Education, I. (2015). Faculty Development. Retrieved from Academic Research: http://global.laureate.net/portal.aspx#

Laureate Education, I. (2015). Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research. Retrieved from Faculty Development: http://global3.laureate.net/#/home/faculty

Qualitative and quantitative research for small business. (n.d.). Retrieved from British Library: http://www.bl.uk/business-and-ip-centre/articles/qualitative-and-quantitative-research-for-small-business




Friday, February 26, 2016



Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research

Academic Research, Mixed-Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Quantitative Research, Research 3 comments


Taken from http://infotoxology.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Mixed-Methods-Approach.png


Quantitative, Qualitative,
and Mixed Methods Research:
What Methodology Suits one’s Research Better

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña-Solano
School of English
Faculty of Social Sciences
Universidad Latina de Costa Rica
Thursday, February 25, 2016
Post 221

         “Selecting a research methodology is not a simple task. The type of research methodology selected has a significant impact on how data will be collected, analyzed, and presented” (Laureate Education, 2015). As a researcher, based on what one’s research intentions are, the choosing of the “right” methodology is crucial. One needs to carefully pick out the methodology that can help comprehend our teaching reality better, our students’ perception of the world, the predictability of reactions when a number of variables are put together, and so on. Though, “historically, researchers selected either quantitative or qualitative approaches” (Laureate Education, 2015), the possible use of what is now termed as mixed methodologies is there for the researcher to make use of.

         “Research methodologies are approaches used to conduct research. Selecting a research methodology is dependent upon two major factors: the nature of the research you plan to conduct and the research question you intend to investigate” (Laureate Education, Academic Research, 2013). Whereas quantitative research aims at gathering large pieces of data “that can be easily organized and manipulated into reports for analysis” (Qualitative and quantitative research for small business, n.d.), qualitative research is “a subjective approach that focuses on examining issues and understanding phenomena related to the values, attitudes, and perceptions of a research subject or group” (Laureate Education, Academic Research, 2013). Both methodologies intend to make what is invisible to the naked eye of the teaching professional visible enough to study and understand it.

         No doubt that quantitative and qualitative research approaches complement each other. A quantitative researcher may aim at trying to understand the cause-effect relationships variables have in given populations; on the other hand, a qualitative researcher’s intention is to analyze the individuals of those given populations’ perceptions of a phenomenon that is going on among group members. However, though this is not exactly recent, many researchers in education may also make use of a mixed methods approach for their research projects. As stated by Creswell (2003), “mixed methods research has come to age. To include only quantitative and qualitative methods falls short of the major approaches being used today in the social and human sciences.” It is for this reason that a mixed methods research design can be much more benefitial in certain types of projects.

Within my field of expertise and work, English Language Teaching (ELT) a mixed methods approach is viable. “Recognizing that all methods have limitations, researchers felt that biases inherent in any single method could neutralize or cancel the biases of other methods” (Creswell, 2003). In other words, though there has been a sort of rivalry between defenders of any of the two research methods, the fact is that they can complement each other when data is analyzed and triangulated to give it real validity. We can perfectly enhance research studies with “sequential procedures” that can help researchers “elaborate on or expand findings of one method with another method,” with “concurrent procedures, in which the researcher converges quantitative and qualitative data in order to provide a comprehensive analysis of the research problem,” and with “transformative procedures” that are used as “a theoretical lens” that can overarch a perspective “within a design that contains both quantitative and qualitative data” (Creswell, 2003).

Taken from http://www.slideshare.net/uqudent/introduction-to-qualitative-and-mixed-methods-research-uqudent-bajammal

To conclude, as a researcher in the field of education, any teaching professional can embark him/herself in research projects. One cannot look down on oneself by saying that we professionals cannot carry out a research project, because the fact is that we are entitled to do it, especially when we see the reality many of our learners live in our classrooms. Moreover, there are phenomena that we want to comprehend to assist them on their learning by exploring what they experience as students or by introducing variables that can yield a different output when applied to large numbers of learners. Any of us faculty members or instructors can become active researchers in our classrooms or in our institutions to help our pupils create their knowledge much more successfully.

References


Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://ucalgary.ca/paed/files/paed/2003_creswell_a-framework-for-design.pdf

Laureate Education, I. (2013). Academic Research. Retrieved from Faculty Development: https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/bbcswebdav/institution/LPS1/

Laureate Education, I. (2015). Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research. Retrieved from Faculty Development: http://global3.laureate.net/#/home/faculty

Qualitative and quantitative research for small business. (n.d.). Retrieved from British Library: http://www.bl.uk/business-and-ip-centre/articles/qualitative-and-quantitative-research-for-small-business



Taken from http://www.differencebtw.com/difference-between-quantitative-and-qualitative-research/


Thursday, February 25, 2016



Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

    Reflective Online Teaching

    Reflective Online Teaching
    Since 2010

    Visitors

    Costa Rica

    Costa Rica
    My Home Country

    525 Pots and counting

    525 Pots and counting

    TESOL Certified Instructor

    TESOL Certified Instructor

    Certified Virtual Instructor

    Certified Virtual Instructor

    PD Talks & NCTE-Costa Rica

    PD Talks & NCTE-Costa Rica

    Copyscape

    Protected by Copyscape

    Blog Archive

    • ▼  2026 (25)
      • ▼  February (13)
        • Finding One’s Voice in the Classroom: Themistocles...
        • The Gossiping Witness: Narrative Voice and Reliabi...
        • The Nature of Learner Error in ELT: Distinguishing...
        • If the Gods of the Past Were Not Gods: Interdiscip...
        • Designing Group Contracts and Managing Group Work ...
        • Witnessing Genius and Loss: Marcellus, Archimedes,...
        • Understanding Group Dynamics and Learner Groupings...
        • Everyday Ethics and the Pedagogy of Kindness in Wi...
        • Understanding Group Dynamics and Learner Groupings...
        • Art at the Threshold of the 21st Century: Creativi...
        • Differentiation in Action: Owning Learner Success ...
        • Why Lycurgus Is Rarely Taught in Ethics Education:...
        • Differentiation by Task and Support in ELT: Reflec...
      • ►  January (12)
    • ►  2025 (81)
      • ►  December (10)
      • ►  November (12)
      • ►  October (11)
      • ►  September (10)
      • ►  August (8)
      • ►  July (7)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (6)
      • ►  February (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2024 (28)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (5)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (3)
    • ►  2023 (6)
      • ►  September (1)
      • ►  August (5)
    • ►  2022 (1)
      • ►  July (1)
    • ►  2020 (54)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (7)
      • ►  September (11)
      • ►  August (15)
      • ►  July (10)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (5)
    • ►  2019 (13)
      • ►  August (5)
      • ►  July (8)
    • ►  2018 (11)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (7)
      • ►  April (2)
    • ►  2017 (6)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2016 (101)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (7)
      • ►  September (10)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  May (22)
      • ►  April (17)
      • ►  March (21)
      • ►  February (14)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2015 (53)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (13)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  July (8)
      • ►  June (5)
      • ►  May (14)
      • ►  April (4)
    • ►  2014 (40)
      • ►  October (5)
      • ►  September (11)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (8)
      • ►  April (5)
      • ►  February (1)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2013 (46)
      • ►  December (1)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (5)
      • ►  August (6)
      • ►  July (7)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (7)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2012 (17)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (6)
    • ►  2011 (5)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  January (1)
    • ►  2010 (46)
      • ►  December (9)
      • ►  November (14)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (8)
      • ►  January (8)

    Labels

    • #EdChat (8)
    • #LTTO (14)
    • A Princess of Mars (1)
    • A Tale of Two Cities (1)
    • A Woman fo No Importance (1)
    • A1 Learners (1)
    • ABLA (9)
    • Academic Integrity (1)
    • Academic Research (9)
    • Adaptive Learning (1)
    • ADDIE Model (7)
    • Adult ELT (1)
    • Adventure Fiction (1)
    • Affective Filter (1)
    • Afro-Caribbean Lore (1)
    • Agile Professional Development (1)
    • AI Detection (1)
    • AI Ethics (1)
    • AI in ELT (1)
    • Alberto Delgado Alvarez (1)
    • Aldous Huxley (1)
    • Aldus Huxley (1)
    • Alexander Luria (5)
    • Algorithmic Bias (2)
    • Anansi (1)
    • Ancient Astronaut Theory (1)
    • Ancient Mysteries (1)
    • Andragogy (5)
    • Andy Curtis (1)
    • Angelology (2)
    • Animal Consciousness (1)
    • Animal-Machine (1)
    • Aouda (1)
    • Apps for Education (1)
    • Archaeology (1)
    • Archetypes (1)
    • Archimedes (1)
    • Arsène Lupin (1)
    • Art and Technology (1)
    • Artificial Intelligence (2)
    • Artistic Philosophy in ELT (1)
    • Assessment (12)
    • Assessment in Action (2)
    • Assessment Literacy (1)
    • Assessment Practices (6)
    • ASSURE (1)
    • Asynchronous Tools (2)
    • Attention Span (1)
    • Augustine (1)
    • Aural/oral skills (1)
    • Authenticity (1)
    • autonomous learning (1)
    • Autonomy (1)
    • Barthesian Analysis (6)
    • Behavior (1)
    • Being vs. Having (1)
    • Benjamin Button (1)
    • Bergson (1)
    • Betrayal (1)
    • Bettelheim (1)
    • Biblical Monotheism (1)
    • Biblical Text Analysis (1)
    • Big Data (6)
    • Bilingualism (1)
    • Biopolitics (1)
    • Blended Learning (1)
    • BlendIt Course (8)
    • Blind Faith (1)
    • Bloom's Taxonomy (5)
    • BNCs (9)
    • Book Critique (2)
    • Book of Enoch (1)
    • Book of Job (1)
    • Book of Revelation (1)
    • Bookmarking Sites (1)
    • Brave New World (1)
    • Brazilian Literature (2)
    • Brazilian Romanticism (1)
    • Breakout Rooms (1)
    • British Council (9)
    • Bureaucracy (3)
    • Burnout Prevention (1)
    • Cain (1)
    • Carl Jung (2)
    • Case Study (4)
    • Catalog of Rubrics (1)
    • Catholic Storytelling (1)
    • CEF (2)
    • CEFR (1)
    • CEFR-Aligned Assessment (1)
    • Centro Universitario de Desarrollo Intelectual (1)
    • Character Analysis (3)
    • Character Development (1)
    • Charles Dickens (1)
    • Christian Demonology (1)
    • Civil Obedience (1)
    • Classical Biography (1)
    • Classroom Management (7)
    • Classroom Practice (1)
    • Cloud Reader (1)
    • CLT (3)
    • Coaching (1)
    • Coaching in Teacher Classroom Observation (2)
    • Code of Ethics (1)
    • Cognitive Load (1)
    • Collectivism (1)
    • Colombian Poetry (1)
    • Color Motifs (1)
    • Communicating about Uncertainty (1)
    • Communicative Competence (1)
    • Communicative Language Teaching (5)
    • Communities of Practice (2)
    • Community of Practice (8)
    • Comparative Mythology (1)
    • Comparative Religion (2)
    • Competency-Based Learning (9)
    • Conformity (1)
    • Conformity Pressure (1)
    • Connectivism (1)
    • Constructive Alignment (1)
    • Constructivism (1)
    • Contemporary Aesthetics (1)
    • Contemporary Short Fiction (1)
    • Content Assimilation (1)
    • Content Design (1)
    • Cooperative Learning (2)
    • CoP (3)
    • Costa Rica (2)
    • Costa Rican Literature (1)
    • Course Project (2)
    • Creativity (1)
    • critical skills (1)
    • Critical Thinking Skills (2)
    • Cultural Allegory (1)
    • Cultural Assimilation (1)
    • Cultural Centers (1)
    • Culture (11)
    • Culture Framework (2)
    • Culture Teaching (8)
    • Curriculum Design (3)
    • Curriculum Development (6)
    • Custom eLearning (2)
    • Custom Training (1)
    • Dante Alighieri (2)
    • Dante Studies (2)
    • Data Science (7)
    • Data-Driven Teaching (5)
    • Data-Informed Leadership (1)
    • David Fincher (1)
    • DDT (1)
    • Death (1)
    • Deborah Tannen (1)
    • Deductive Grammar Instruction (2)
    • Deep Ecology (1)
    • Dehumanization (1)
    • Demonology (2)
    • Demonology and Devil-Lore (2)
    • Demythologization (1)
    • Deontology (1)
    • Desire (1)
    • Developmental Feedback (1)
    • Diane Larsen-Freeman (1)
    • Didactics (4)
    • Differentiation (3)
    • Digital Culture (1)
    • Digital Inequality (1)
    • Digital Pedagogy (1)
    • Dignity (1)
    • Dino Buzzati (1)
    • Discourse Analysis in ELT (1)
    • Distance Education (2)
    • Dualism (1)
    • Dystopia (2)
    • Dystopian Fiction (1)
    • Dystopian Society (1)
    • E-Portfolios (1)
    • Eco-Criticism (1)
    • Edgar Rice Burroughs (2)
    • Education and Learning (34)
    • Education Policy (2)
    • Education Technologies (9)
    • Educational Evolution (1)
    • Educational Leadership (1)
    • Educational Philosophies (1)
    • EFL/ESL Activities (1)
    • El Clis de Sol (1)
    • eLearning (1)
    • Electracy (1)
    • ELF (1)
    • ELL (17)
    • Elohim (3)
    • ELT (52)
    • ELT Conference (1)
    • ELT Institutions (1)
    • ELT Leadership (1)
    • ELT Professional Development (3)
    • ELT. Teacher Growth (1)
    • Emotional Intelligence (1)
    • Emotional Literacy (2)
    • Empathy (1)
    • English Grammar (3)
    • English Language Teaching (9)
    • English Teaching (1)
    • Enkidu (1)
    • Environmental Destruction (1)
    • Environmental Philosophy (1)
    • Envy (1)
    • Eric Mazur (1)
    • Erich Fromm (4)
    • Error Correction (1)
    • Escape from Freedom (1)
    • Eschatology (1)
    • Esotericism (1)
    • ESP (2)
    • Ethical Judgments (1)
    • Ethical Leadership (1)
    • Ethical Sacrifice (1)
    • Ethics (44)
    • Ethics Analysis (2)
    • Ethics Education (1)
    • Ethics of Care (1)
    • Etiological Storytelling (1)
    • Evaluating Digital Tools (1)
    • Evaluation (4)
    • Evil (1)
    • Executives' School (9)
    • Existentialism (1)
    • Ezekiel (1)
    • F. Scott Fitzgerald (1)
    • Fairy Tales (2)
    • Faivre (1)
    • False Positives (1)
    • Fatalism (1)
    • Fear (1)
    • Feedback (5)
    • Flipped Classroom (1)
    • Flipped Learning (1)
    • Formative Assessment (4)
    • Forums (1)
    • Fossilization (1)
    • Frames-Based Teaching (1)
    • Framing in Discourse (1)
    • Frankenstein (1)
    • Franz Kafka (1)
    • French Literature (1)
    • Freudian Analysis (3)
    • From theory to practice (2)
    • Frommian Analysis (2)
    • Future for Education? (2)
    • Gabriel Escorcia Gravini (1)
    • Gamification (1)
    • George Orwell (1)
    • Global Competence (1)
    • Global Ethics (7)
    • Gnosticism (1)
    • Gothic Literature (1)
    • Grading Ranges (1)
    • Grammar (3)
    • Group Dynamics (2)
    • Group Work (2)
    • Guest Author (1)
    • Guided Practice (2)
    • H. G. Wells (1)
    • H.P. Lovecraft (3)
    • Haiku (2)
    • Hanegraaff (1)
    • HD Brown (1)
    • Hebrew Mythology (1)
    • Hermeticism (2)
    • Higher Education (49)
    • Higher Education Ethics (1)
    • Historical–Biographical Criticism (1)
    • History (2)
    • Homerton College Cambridge Course (2)
    • Hootcourse (1)
    • Horacio Quiroga (1)
    • Human Dignity (1)
    • Human Rights (1)
    • Human-Centered Narrative (1)
    • Human-Centered Pedagogy (1)
    • Hybrid and Blended Learning (61)
    • Hybrid In-person Teaching (1)
    • Hybrid Learning Models (1)
    • Ideology (2)
    • Idioms (1)
    • Iktomi (1)
    • Imagery (1)
    • Inclusive Education (1)
    • Inclusive Pedagogy (2)
    • Independent Practice (1)
    • Individuation (1)
    • Inductive Grammar Instruction (2)
    • Inferno XXXIII (1)
    • infographic (1)
    • Institutional Culture (1)
    • Institutional Improvement (1)
    • Institutional Memory (1)
    • Instruction-Giving (1)
    • Instructional Design (3)
    • Integration of Technology into Teaching (10)
    • Interdisciplinary Inquiry (1)
    • Interlanguage (1)
    • Interventions in ELL (1)
    • Irony (2)
    • Isaac Asimov (1)
    • Issus (1)
    • Italian Literature (1)
    • Jacqueline Alves Souza (1)
    • Jacques de Molay (1)
    • Jacques Lacan (4)
    • James Knowles (1)
    • James Thurber (1)
    • Japanese Folklore (1)
    • Jehovah (1)
    • Jeremiah (1)
    • Jewish Apocalypticism (1)
    • Jewish Mysticism (1)
    • John Carter (1)
    • José de Alencar (1)
    • JotForm (1)
    • Journey to the Center of the Earth (1)
    • Jules Verne (3)
    • Jungian Analysis (7)
    • Just-in-Time Training (1)
    • Kabbalah (1)
    • Kahlil Gibran (2)
    • Kathleen M. Bailey (1)
    • Kindness (1)
    • King Arthur and his knights (1)
    • Kirkpatrick Model (15)
    • Knight Templars (1)
    • Kurt Vonnegut (1)
    • La gran miseria humana (1)
    • La Insolación (1)
    • Lacan (1)
    • Lacanian Analysis (7)
    • Language (1)
    • Language Competences (1)
    • Language Education (2)
    • Language Institutions (1)
    • Language Learning (14)
    • Language Series Comparative Analysis (1)
    • Language Teaching (8)
    • Latin American Literature (3)
    • Laureate Course Module 3 Teaching with Technology (19)
    • Laureate Educator (4)
    • Laureate Educator in the XXI Century (2)
    • Laureate Educator-Week 1 (1)
    • Laureate Educator-Week 2 (1)
    • Laureate Educator-Week 3 (1)
    • Leadership (9)
    • learner autonomy (2)
    • Learner Diversity (3)
    • Learner Engagement (1)
    • Learner Grouping (2)
    • Learner-Centered Pedagogy (1)
    • Learner-Centeredness (1)
    • Learning (8)
    • Learning Activities (1)
    • Learning Analytics (1)
    • Learning Objectives (2)
    • Learning Preferences (1)
    • Learning Styles (1)
    • Learning Technologies (1)
    • Leopoldo Lugones (1)
    • Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Pablo Picasso (1)
    • Lesson Design (2)
    • Lesson Planning (6)
    • Lev Vygotsky (4)
    • Libraries (1)
    • Life is a Dream (1)
    • Life Stories (1)
    • Linguistics (2)
    • Listening (1)
    • Literary Analysis (6)
    • Literary Criticism (24)
    • Literary Ethics (1)
    • Literature (35)
    • LMS (6)
    • Lord’s Prayer (1)
    • LOTI Profile (5)
    • Love (2)
    • Lycurgus (1)
    • Machado de Assis (1)
    • Machiavellian Narration (1)
    • Mãe (1)
    • Magón (1)
    • MakerSpace (1)
    • Manuel González Zeledón (1)
    • Marcel Duchamp (6)
    • Marcellus (1)
    • Marxist Literary Approach (1)
    • Mary Shelly (1)
    • Materials Design (1)
    • Maurice Leblanc (1)
    • Meaning of Justice (1)
    • Melodrama (1)
    • Mentalism (1)
    • Mentorship (1)
    • MEP (Ministerio de Educación Pública) (1)
    • Metacognition (3)
    • Metadata (1)
    • Metaphysics. Self-Mastery (1)
    • Methodology (3)
    • Micro-Ethics (1)
    • microcelebrities (1)
    • Microlearning (1)
    • Mind Maps (2)
    • Mindfulness (12)
    • Misogyny (1)
    • Mistake vs. Error (1)
    • Mixed-Ability Classes (1)
    • Mixed-Methods Research (4)
    • Mobile Learning (1)
    • Modeling in ELT (1)
    • Modern Realism (1)
    • Modular Learning (1)
    • Moncure Daniel Conway (5)
    • MOOCs (1)
    • Moodle (5)
    • Moral Allegory (1)
    • Moral Biography (1)
    • Moral Cannibalism (1)
    • Moral Education (1)
    • Moral Lesson (1)
    • Moral Responsibility (1)
    • Moral Theology (2)
    • Moral-Humanistic Criticism (1)
    • Morality (1)
    • Motherhood (1)
    • Motivation (3)
    • Music and Learning (1)
    • Myth Interpretation (1)
    • Myth of Evil (1)
    • Mythological Archetypes (1)
    • Mythology (1)
    • Narrative Empathy (1)
    • Narrative Structure (2)
    • Narrative Voice (1)
    • Nature Spirits (1)
    • Necropolitics (1)
    • Needs Assessment (3)
    • Netiquette (1)
    • Network Community (1)
    • NGL (1)
    • Nicaraguan Literature (2)
    • Nicatesol (1)
    • Nietzsche (1)
    • Nive Events of Instruction (1)
    • Nonviolent Communication (6)
    • ñor Cornelio Cacheda (1)
    • Nouns in English (1)
    • Novice Teachers (3)
    • Nudos (1)
    • Objective Writing (1)
    • OER (1)
    • Off-the-Shelf Learning (1)
    • Online Community (1)
    • Online Instruction (55)
    • online learning (46)
    • Online Learning Programs (1)
    • Online Persona (9)
    • Online Program Design (1)
    • online teaching (4)
    • Online Teaching Approach (1)
    • Online Teaching Practices (72)
    • Oral Assessment (1)
    • Oral Communication (1)
    • Oral Skills (2)
    • Organizational Learning (1)
    • Orientalism (1)
    • Oscar Wilde (1)
    • Padre Luis Coloma (1)
    • Paper.li (1)
    • Passepartout (1)
    • Pater Noster (1)
    • Paul of Tarsus (1)
    • Paz a los muertos! (1)
    • PBL (1)
    • PD (2)
    • Peace to the Dead! (1)
    • Pedagogy (2)
    • Pedro Calderón de la Barca (1)
    • Peer Instruction (1)
    • Penitence (1)
    • Penny Ur (2)
    • Personal Learning Networks (2)
    • Phileas Fogg (1)
    • Philosophy (1)
    • Phonemics (4)
    • Phonetics (4)
    • Phonotactics (3)
    • Pilot Programs (1)
    • PLEs and PLNs for Lifelong Learning Competencies Week 1 (1)
    • Plot Analysis (1)
    • Plutarch (4)
    • Poetry (2)
    • Poetry Analysis (1)
    • Political Discourse (1)
    • Political Heroism (1)
    • Popol Vuh (1)
    • Population Control (1)
    • Postcolonialism (1)
    • Posthumanism (1)
    • Pride (1)
    • Procrustean Syndrome (1)
    • Produsage (1)
    • Produser (1)
    • Professional Capital (2)
    • Professional Competencies (1)
    • Professional Development (10)
    • Professional Growth (1)
    • Professional Identity (1)
    • Projec-Based Learning (1)
    • Promethean Myth (1)
    • Pronunciation (7)
    • Psychoanalysis (2)
    • Psychological Analysis (1)
    • Psychological Resilience (1)
    • Psychology (1)
    • Public Speaking (1)
    • Purgatorio XI (1)
    • Qualitative Research (4)
    • Quantitative Research (4)
    • Rapport (1)
    • rationality (1)
    • Reading (1)
    • Reading and Vocabulary (2)
    • Recruitment (1)
    • Recycling in Education (1)
    • Reflective Communities (1)
    • Reflective Evaluation (2)
    • Reflective Journaling (5)
    • Reflective Practice (13)
    • Reflective Reading (1)
    • Reflective Teacher Communities (1)
    • Reflective Teacher Leadership (1)
    • Reflective Teaching (59)
    • Religious Authority (1)
    • Religious Evolution (1)
    • Research (9)
    • Resilience (1)
    • Return on Investment (1)
    • Richard Schmidt (2)
    • Risk Communication (1)
    • Robert Frost (1)
    • Robert Gagné (2)
    • ROI (1)
    • ROI in ELT (1)
    • Roland Barthes (3)
    • Roman Conquest (1)
    • RTC (1)
    • Ruben Puentedura (1)
    • Rubric-Based Planning (1)
    • Rubrics (3)
    • Samael (1)
    • SAMR Model (1)
    • Scaffolding (2)
    • Schema (1)
    • Scholasticism (1)
    • Science Fiction (1)
    • Science Fiction Studies (1)
    • Scoop.it! (1)
    • Second Language Acquisition (5)
    • Secret Societies of the Middle Ages (1)
    • Semiotics (2)
    • Sentence Patterns (1)
    • Shadow (1)
    • Short Films (1)
    • Short Stories (4)
    • Short Story Analysis (1)
    • Sioux Legends (3)
    • Sir Gareth (1)
    • Sir Gawain (1)
    • Sir Lancelot (1)
    • Sir Tristam (1)
    • Skepticism (1)
    • Sketchpads (1)
    • Skill Gap Analysis (1)
    • SLA (4)
    • Slavery in Brazil (1)
    • Social Agency (1)
    • Social Criticism (1)
    • Social Media (29)
    • Social Networking in Education (3)
    • Social Transformation (1)
    • Son of Man (1)
    • Sparta (1)
    • Speaking (1)
    • Speaking Scenarios (1)
    • Stephen Krashen (1)
    • Sticky Curriculum (1)
    • Storytelling (1)
    • Strategies for online teaching (2)
    • Student Agency (1)
    • Student Assessment (1)
    • Student Engagement (1)
    • Student Interest (3)
    • Student Motivation (2)
    • Student Tips (2)
    • Sumerian (1)
    • Summative Assessment (2)
    • Supervision (1)
    • Sustainability (1)
    • Symbolic Philosophy (1)
    • Symbolism (3)
    • Synchronous Online Teaching (1)
    • Syntax (2)
    • Syracuse (1)
    • Task-Based Instruction (1)
    • Task-Based Language Teaching (1)
    • Task-Based Learning (1)
    • TBI (1)
    • TBLT (2)
    • Teacher Agency (2)
    • Teacher Development (23)
    • Teacher Education (1)
    • Teacher Evaluation (2)
    • Teacher Feedback (2)
    • Teacher Identity (2)
    • Teacher Inquiry (1)
    • Teacher Mentoring (2)
    • Teacher Mentorship (1)
    • Teacher Observation (1)
    • Teacher Professional Development (2)
    • Teacher Reflection (2)
    • Teacher Training (5)
    • Teacher Well-being (4)
    • Teacher Well-Being. Kirkpatrick Model (1)
    • Teacher–Student Relationships (1)
    • Teaching (47)
    • Teaching Adolescents (1)
    • Teaching ePortfolio (1)
    • Teaching Grammar (2)
    • Teaching Models (1)
    • Teaching Online (9)
    • Teaching Philosophy (4)
    • Teaching Portfolio (1)
    • Teaching Practices (49)
    • Teaching Practicum (22)
    • Teaching Presence (2)
    • Teaching Styles (8)
    • Teaching Tips (9)
    • Teaching With Technology (4)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 1 (1)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 2 (1)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 3 (2)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 4 (4)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 5 (3)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 6 (2)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 7 (3)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 8 (2)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 9 (1)
    • Tech Tip (5)
    • Technocriticism (1)
    • Technological Assessment (2)
    • Technology Use Tips (1)
    • Templars (1)
    • Temporality (1)
    • Testing (1)
    • The Art of Loving (1)
    • The Assassins (1)
    • The Book of Proverbs (1)
    • The Butterfly Circus (1)
    • The Cats of Ulthar (1)
    • The Data Scientist (5)
    • The Epic of Gilgamish (1)
    • The Gods of Mars (1)
    • The Kybalion (2)
    • The Loincloth (1)
    • The New Normal (1)
    • The Noticing Hypothesis (2)
    • The Outsider (1)
    • The Prophet (2)
    • The Real (1)
    • The Road Not Take (1)
    • The Time Machine (1)
    • Theater Criticism (1)
    • Themistocles (1)
    • Theophoric Names (1)
    • Theseus (1)
    • Thomas Keightley (2)
    • Thomistic Ethics (1)
    • Thomistic Grace (1)
    • Tolkien (1)
    • Trickster (1)
    • Trinity (1)
    • Turnitin (1)
    • UCC (1)
    • Ugarit (1)
    • Ugolino (1)
    • Universidad Mariano Gálvez (2)
    • Unreliable Narrator (1)
    • Utilitarianism (1)
    • Vengeance (1)
    • Videoconferencing Platforms (1)
    • Virtual Classroom Features (1)
    • Virtual Classrooms (1)
    • Virtual Learning Environments (8)
    • Virtual Teaching (5)
    • Virtualized Teaching (1)
    • Virtue (1)
    • Visual Literacy (1)
    • VLE (47)
    • VLEs (38)
    • Vocabulary learning (10)
    • WAS (14)
    • Web 2.0 (4)
    • Web search engine options (1)
    • Web Tools (6)
    • WebQuests (1)
    • Western Esotericism (1)
    • Western Mysticism (1)
    • Wilbert Salgado (12)
    • William Elliot Griffis (1)
    • Working Adult Student (5)
    • Workplace Dynamics (1)
    • writing (2)
    • Writing Skills (1)
    • Yahweh (1)
    • Yzur (1)
    • Zecharia Sitchin (1)
    • ZPD (1)

Copyright © All Rights Reserved. Reflective Online Teaching | Converted into Blogger Templates by Theme Craft