|
🪶 Introductory Note to
the Reader I bumped into Dino Buzzati’s short story
“Una cosa che comincia per elle” by mere chance, not because I was
looking for it, but probably because it was time to read some more modern
literature from Italy beyond Dante Alighieri. What I found was not just a story, but a
quiet moral earthquake. After finishing it, I had the unsettling sensation
that there was something morally rotten within it, a discomfort that
lingered for days. This unease compelled me to dissect the story, to
understand the roots of that gut feeling I had toward its plot and its three
haunting figures: Cristoforo Schroder, Dr. Lugosi, and Don Valerio Melito. What started as mere curiosity evolved
into a reflection on power, fear, and the tragic ease with which morality
collapses under the weight of authority. The essay that follows is both my
analysis and my attempt to make peace with that moral disquiet. |
Cruelty, Fear, and Bureaucratic Conscience in Dino Buzzati’s “Una cosa che comincia per elle”
|
|
🪶 Abstract This
paper examines Dino Buzzati’s “Una cosa che comincia per elle” (A
Thing That Begins with L) as a moral parable that dramatizes the
intersection of fear, power, and social exclusion. Through the figures of
Cristoforo Schroder, Dr. Lugosi, and Don Valerio Melito, Buzzati reveals how
bourgeois self-assurance, bureaucratic cowardice, and institutional cruelty
converge into a collective moral failure. The essay applies a structured
character analysis framework to delineate each character’s physical, social,
and psychological traits, as well as their moral objectives and complexes.
Drawing on scholars such as Keon (2004), Moser (2010), and Moravia (1968), it
argues that Buzzati constructs an allegory of contamination that transcends
disease to critique the ethical decay of modern civilization. The final
dialogue between the narrator and Don Valerio Melito revisits the story’s
unresolved moral tension, turning the bell’s sound into an enduring symbol of
guilt and bureaucratic conscience. |
🪶 Keywords: Dino Buzzati, Italian Literature, Moral
Allegory, Bureaucracy, Fear, Dehumanization |
|
|
|
🪶 Resumen Este trabajo analiza “Una cosa que comincia per
elle” de Dino Buzzati como una parábola moral sobre el miedo, el poder y
la exclusión social. A través de los personajes Cristoforo Schroder, el
doctor Lugosi y Don Valerio Melito, Buzzati muestra cómo la autosuficiencia
burguesa, la cobardía burocrática y la crueldad institucional se combinan en
un fracaso moral colectivo. Utilizando una plantilla de análisis de
personajes, se describen los rasgos físicos, sociales y psicológicos, así
como las metas y conflictos internos de cada uno. Con apoyo en estudios
críticos de Keon (2004), Moser (2010) y Moravia (1968), se demuestra que la
“contaminación” en el cuento funciona como metáfora de la deshumanización
moderna. El diálogo final entre el narrador y Don Valerio transforma la
campanilla en un símbolo persistente de culpa y conciencia burocrática. |
|
|
|
|
🪶 Resumo Este artigo examina “Una cosa che comincia per
elle” de Dino Buzzati como uma parábola moral sobre o medo, o poder e a
exclusão social. Por meio das figuras de Cristoforo Schroder, do Dr. Lugosi e
de Don Valerio Melito, Buzzati revela como a autossuficiência burguesa, a
covardia burocrática e a crueldade institucional se unem em um fracasso moral
coletivo. Aplicando uma ficha de análise de personagens, o estudo descreve
seus traços físicos, sociais e psicológicos, além de seus objetivos e
complexos morais. Com base em Keon (2004), Moser (2010) e Moravia (1968),
argumenta-se que a “contaminação” no conto ultrapassa o sentido literal da
doença e representa a decadência ética da civilização moderna. O diálogo
final entre o narrador e Don Valerio converte o som do sino em metáfora de
culpa e consciência burocrática. |
|
|
Introduction
Dino
Buzzati’s “Una cosa che comincia per elle” (A thing that begins with L) presents
a chilling moral allegory about power, fear, and human cruelty. Through the
characters of Cristoforo Schroder, Dr. Lugosi, and Don Valerio Melito, Buzzati
exposes how social hierarchies and moral cowardice deform human relationships
when confronted with contagion, both literal and symbolic. The intention of my
essay is to analyze the three figures following the structure of a Character
Analysis Worksheet I created for my literature classes at the university
where I work and to integrate critical interpretations from modern Italian
literary scholarship. The annex at the end of this paper details the physical,
social, and psychological profiles and objectives of each character,
demonstrating how Buzzati constructs a moral fable that remains profoundly
relevant in discussions of authority and exclusion.
Cristoforo Schroder: The
Self-Made Man Undone by Fear
Cristoforo
Schroder, a middle-aged timber merchant, embodies the rational self-assurance
of the bourgeois man in early twentieth-century Italy. Physically robust,
confident, and accustomed to comfort, his health initially falters in a minor
way, a prelude to moral collapse. He dresses with care but also with the
practicality of a tradesman who measures worth in material success. His
profession situates him within the upper-middle class, a man respected for his
wealth but not for compassion. Educated through commerce rather than culture,
Schroder treats human interaction as transaction; his sense of class privilege
gives him authority even over those he barely knows. Within the community, he
represents efficiency and self-sufficiency, visiting Sisto as part of routine
business. His leisure is limited to the self-satisfaction of routine prosperity,
Buzzati’s subtle critique of bourgeois inertia (Keon, 2004).
Psychologically,
Schroder is confident yet morally impoverished. His moral standard is
utilitarian: “good deeds are measured by cost.” He pays the “poor devil”
two lire and considers his conscience clear. His philosophy of life values
control, productivity, and measurable reward, while his ambition is to remain a
successful, self-reliant man untouched by misfortune or unseen events.
Disappointment comes only when that self-image is fractured by public
humiliation in the hand of Valerio Melito. His chief complex lies in fearing
dependency and loss of respectability. His ability to adapt, evident in his
swift, businesslike application of the leeches, contrasts with his total
inability to adapt to disgrace, something he has to undergo at the end of the
short story. Peculiarly proud of competence but ignorant of empathy, Schroder
symbolizes what Moravia (1968) called “la disumanizzazione dell’uomo borghese”
(the dehumanization of the bourgeois spirit). His ultimate objective, the
preservation of autonomy and dignity, collapses the moment society marks him as
impure due to leper. Schroder’s downfall is not his contact with leprosy but
his inability to imagine solidarity beyond the self.
|
Cristoforo Schroder: The Self-Assured
Merchant |
|
|
Physical
and Social Traits |
Schroder
is a middle-aged male merchant in timber, prosperous and accustomed to
authority. His health initially appears compromised, but his ailment becomes
symbolic of moral blindness rather than physical decay. His clothing—shirt
sleeves, vest, traveling gear—emphasizes practicality and bourgeois
confidence. |
|
Psychological
Profile
|
Schroder’s
moral standard rests on utilitarian decency: he pays the poor man two lire
and considers the matter closed. His philosophy values control and
efficiency; compassion exists only within transactional boundaries. Ambition
and pride dominate his psyche, while empathy is conspicuously absent. His
greatest complex lies in fearing loss of status more than loss of humanity. |
|
Objective |
His
super-objective is to preserve autonomy and dignity. His will, however,
collapses once authority brands him a leper. Buzzati transforms him from
master to outcast, forcing him to confront the fragility of self-image when
confronted with stigma. |
Dr. Lugosi: The Physician as
Cowardly Bureaucrat
Dr.
Lugosi, an aging country doctor, probably better of than other people in the
town, serves as the moral intermediary in Buzzati’s parable. Physically, he is
frail and habitually cautious, a man whose body mirrors his reluctance to act.
His clothing, professional but worn, denotes both respectability and fatigue.
Socially, he belongs to the educated middle class, respected but dependent on
patronage from men like Schroder or officials like Don Valerio. His profession
gives him access to truth; he knows disease but not the moral courage to defend
it. His role in the community is that of a mediator between the sick and the
healthy, yet he functions more as an agent of institutional order than of
healing. His amusements are minimal, perhaps limited to social politeness and
gossip.
Internally,
Dr. Lugosi is governed by fear and conformity. His moral standards center on
discretion rather than justice; he avoids conflict even at the cost of
integrity. His philosophy of life prioritizes self-preservation: to remain
useful, compliant, and respected. His ambition, to maintain his reputation as a
competent doctor, is modest but absolute. His disappointment lies in realizing
his impotence before the system he serves and that he dares not to oppose. His
complex is one of dependency on authority; he prefers complicity to moral
isolation. His ability lies in observation and procedure, yet his peculiarity
is his aversion to direct confrontation, symbolized by his inability to touch
leeches, a grotesque parallel to his aversion to suffering. As Moser (2010)
notes, Buzzati’s postwar fiction often portrays “the functionary as both victim
and perpetrator of fear,” and Dr. Lugosi epitomizes this duality. His objective
is to avoid scandal and preserve the appearance of normalcy, but this objective
turns him into an accomplice of institutional and systematic cruelty. Dr. Lugosi’s
moral paralysis, his whispered “It was an accident!”, is not redemption but
self-justification.
|
Dr. Lugosi: The Weak Mediator |
|
|
Physical
and Social Traits |
Dr.
Lugosi is an aging provincial physician of modest means and education. His
profession grants him respectability but not moral courage. |
|
Psychological
Profile |
His
moral code is that of avoidance: to maintain social harmony rather than
pursue truth or mercy. His philosophy privileges procedure over compassion.
His disappointment lies in decades of professional stagnation; he has learned
to “survive” by yielding to authority. His peculiar trait—repulsion toward
leeches—ironically mirrors his inability to confront human suffering
directly. |
|
Objective |
He
wishes to keep his reputation untainted. His weak will leads him to
collaborate with Don Valerio’s decree, rationalizing obedience as medical
duty. In doing so, he becomes the bureaucrat of fear, betraying both his
patient and his profession. |
Don Valerio Melito: The
Magistrate as Moral Executioner
Don
Valerio Melito enters the story as a jovial acquaintance but emerges as the
embodiment of bureaucratic sadism and social cruelty. Physically, he is
ruddy-faced, thick-set, and coarse; his ample cloak conceals both a pistol and
a moral void. His clothing and weapon are props of state power, signs of
official legitimacy and latent violence. Socially, Melito is an upper-class
official, educated and secure in his authority as alcade, the local
magistrate. Within the community, he represents law and order, though his
demeanor borders on vulgarity, suggesting the corruption of moral and civic
ideals. His amusements lie in control and intimidation; he enjoys the
theatricality of punishment, something that is quite notorious when addressing
Cristoforo Schroder.
Psychologically,
Melito’s moral standard, if that can be labeled like that, rests on perverted
duty. He convinces himself that purging contamination protects society,
transforming cruelty into civic virtue. His philosophy values order over
empathy, law over conscience. His ambitions are rooted in dominance and the
maintenance of social hierarchy; his disappointment is the absence of
recognition or gratitude for his “service.” His complex lies in the projection
of his own insecurity onto others: he eradicates what he secretly fears within
himself, impurity, weakness, moral decay. His ability lies in manipulation,
rhetoric, and coercion; his peculiarity is his relish for public humiliation,
evident when he forces Cristoforo Schroder to wear and ring the bell. As Keon
(2004) observes, Buzzati’s officials are “not monsters by nature but by
function”, a chilling insight into Melito’s psychology. His objective is
absolute control, his will unyielding. The magistrate is not merely the
enforcer of law but the dramaturge of shame, orchestrating a ritual that
reaffirms his power through another’s degradation.
|
Don Valerio Melito: The Magistrate as
Executioner |
|
|
Physical
and Social Traits |
Melito
is a ruddy, middle-aged man, solid and coarse in demeanor. As alcade
(magistrate), he embodies state power cloaked in civility. His pistol and
cloak are props of intimidation, and his position confers both authority and
impunity. |
|
Psychological
Profile |
Melito’s
moral standard is perverted justice: order above empathy. His philosophy
treats disease as impurity to be purged. His ambition is to assert control
through ritual humiliation; his disappointment stems from moral impotence
disguised as righteousness. His complex lies in projecting disgust toward
others’ impurity to mask his own corruption. His peculiar cruelty—mocking
Schroder as he rings the bell—reveals a sadistic need to dramatize punishment
publicly. |
|
Objective |
His
super-objective is to enforce social hygiene by annihilating the
contaminated. His will is ironclad, fueled by the pleasure of dominance.
Buzzati constructs him as the embodiment of institutional evil that thrives
under the guise of legality. |
Conclusion
Together,
Schroder, Lugosi, and Melito form a tragic triad of moral failure. Schroder
represents egocentric individualism; Lugosi, bureaucratic cowardice; and
Melito, institutional cruelty. Each reveals a different response to fear:
denial, submission, and domination. Their convergence produces what Barthes
(1972) would call a “mythology of contamination”, a social narrative in which
purity is maintained only through spectacle and exclusion. The bell Schroder is
forced to ring becomes a symbol of civilization’s complicity in its own
dehumanization. Buzzati thus portrays not only one man’s condemnation but
society’s ritual need to condemn, to define itself against the outcast. The
story ends with Schroder’s bell ringing “den, den,” its sound both pure and accusatory,
a reminder that, in Buzzati’s moral universe, those who enforce purity are the
most contaminated of all.
📚 References
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Hill
and Wang.
Buzzati, D. (1966). Una cosa che comincia per elle. In Sessanta
racconti. Milano: Mondadori.
Keon, P. (2004). The moral parables of Dino Buzzati. University of
Toronto Press.
Moravia, A. (1968). L’uomo come fine. Bompiani.
Moser, K. (2010). Fear and bureaucracy in postwar Italian fiction. Modern
Language Review, 105(3), 650–668.
[Character Analysis Worksheet]. (n.d.). Unpublished instructional material.
Some creative writing in a drama-like style to explore the story beyond the surface
|
Dialogue: The Witness Narrator and Don
Valerio Melito |
|
|
Setting: A
desolate courtroom in Sisto, years later. The narrator, representing the
collective conscience of the story, confronts Don Valerio Melito, now aged
and weary. |
|
|
WN: |
Don
Valerio, it’s been years since that morning at the inn. People still whisper
about the merchant with the bell. Do you ever think of him? |
|
Melito: |
(sighs)
The law doesn’t allow sentiment. My duty was clear. He was a leper. |
|
WN: |
Was
he? Or did you need him to be? The doctor was uncertain. You decided before
the truth arrived. |
|
Melito: |
In
doubt, one must act for the safety of all. Fear spreads faster than disease.
If I had hesitated, the town would have turned on itself. |
|
WN: |
Yet
it was you who made them turn on him. You watched as they drew back
while he crossed the square. |
|
Melito: |
Order
requires example. Without the spectacle, no one learns. The bell warned them,
protected them. |
|
WN: |
Or
entertained you? You smiled when he trembled. You mocked him as “a fine
leper.” What kind of justice laughs at its own sentence? |
|
Melito: |
(voice
hardens) Justice must be feared to be believed. If pity governed us, every
contagion would triumph. |
|
WN: |
Then
you believe compassion is weakness. |
|
Melito: |
Compassion
breeds anarchy. The strong must shield the weak, even from their own
sympathy. |
|
WN: |
You
speak like a priest of fear. But tell me, when you sleep, do you still hear
the bell? |
|
Melito: |
(pause)
I do. Not always. Sometimes it stops just before dawn. Then starts again,
softer. You wouldn’t understand; the sound is clean. It absolves me. |
|
WN: |
Absolution
doesn’t come from noise, Don Valerio. It comes from repentance. |
|
Melito: |
(bitterly)
And who would forgive the judge? The law doesn’t forgive; it only ends cases. |
|
WN: |
But
this case never ended. Schroder’s bell still echoes in the square, though the
cobblestones have been replaced. Children play where he walked. None know his
name, but the air remembers. And so do you. |
|
Melito: |
(defeated)
I thought I served the state. I see now I served my fear. The bell was not
his; it was mine. Each ring announced my cowardice. |
|
WN: |
Then
perhaps you are finally cured, not of leprosy, but of blindness. Tell me, if
you could relive that morning, what would you do? |
|
Melito: |
(after
a long silence) I would let him wash. Feed him. Sit beside him. Even if it
killed me. |
|
WN: |
Then
the sound you hear is not a curse, but a call, to remember what men become
when they mistake obedience for virtue. |
|
(The
magistrate lowers his head. The narrator turns toward the open window.
Outside, a faint bell rings once, clear, distant, almost merciful.) |
|
Short Story: Something Beginning with ‘L’ by Dino Buzzati
Reader’s Handout - Dino Buzzati’s “A Thing That Begins with L”
Cruelty, Fear, And Bureaucratic Conscience in Dino Buzzati’s “Una Cosa Che Comincia Per Elle” by Jonathan Acuña




Post a Comment