Picture
taken by Jonathan Acuña at The British Museum, London, England (2018)
Connecting to
a Bigger Picture
Who’s really
listening in social media?
By
Prof. Jonathan Acuña-Solano, M. Ed.
|
|
Head
of Curriculum Development
Academic
Department
Centro
Cultural Costarricense-Norteamericano
|
Senior Language Professor
School of English
Faculty
of Social Sciences
Universidad
Latina de Costa Rica
|
Thursday, July 30, 2020
Post
354
|
Social media is being used for numerous
reasons. It is not just a place where an individual is torn apart between his
personal online self and his professional persona; it goes beyond this point.
Social media is also used by corporations, and even by people in the government
to sway people’s opinions and course of actions. But is this way of seeing
social media a full gamut of ways to gather like-minded individuals to act and
behave in willful ways to favor ideas or political instability?
Let us take the case of fake news. In
my home country, Costa Rica, congresspeople who do not favor our current
government’s policies and ways of doing things have posted “campaigns” to
discredit this presidential administration’s achievements. When confronted
about the fake news he and his brother had published on their webpage, congressman
Jonathan Prendas defended their publication of the news regarding the increase in
the current sales tax in the country from 13% to 16% (Sequeira & Chinchilla, 2019) , something that was
not true.
Prendas’s
news became viral and was then shared multiple times through different social
media sites, and people started a wrestling match in earnest against the
government and the approval of this new law. The question that remains unanswered
is, “why did Congressman Prendas, being a member of a political party with a
Protestant creed and religious affiliation, lie and induce others to error?”
Part of the answer is that congresspeople know the power behind social media
and try to exercise their influence as public, political figures. The cunning,
immoral, and covetous intentions of the powerful can manipulate the mass to act,
usually in their favor, even when a lie is contradicting the facts.
Now let us take the case of a marketing
corporation behind a political campaign. My second example is related to the
2014 presidential election in Costa Rica. The winner, President Luis Guillermo
Solís, had jointly worked with a marketing corporation that profit from their
listening to the social media platforms used by voters in Costa Rica. Though
the losing political party, whose candidate was Johnny Araya, all were cast
down by the electoral defeat; they all underestimated the power exercised by
the marketing corporation on all social networks to discredit Araya.
Araya’s
ideas, projects, and political campaign promises were deemed to be
inappropriate for the country and exclusive because the poor, the needy, and
the middle class were going to be highly affected. Understanding his defeat,
Araya stepped out of his running for the presidency (DW Akademie, 2014) . Had voters read and understood Araya’s
potential government program and path? Probably not, but influencers in social
media paid by Solís’s campaign team strengthened the dire repercussions of
Araya’s future actions if he got elected. Unethically or not, emotional
contagion was used, and Araya’s dream to get elected president of Costa Rica
evaporated into the ethersphere.
One thing is certain so far,
corporations and people in governmental positions do listen to social media and
quickly identify the trends in it, or they create those trends. If this is a
sign that we are experiencing a greater connection to society, well it is
happening, but this is not a two-way street, at least in a Latin American
context. We have also understood that fake news can come from all sort of
sources, even with spiteful intentions to discredit positive achievements in the
government. Aside from this, we can also see that a political campaign can be
taken to the social media platforms to sway people’s voting intentions. We are
confronted with interesting ethical issues that were never, ever considered
when social media were born in the world.
References
DW Akademie. (2014, March 5). Johnny Araya abandona la
segunda vuelta en las elecciones presidenciales de Costa Rica. Germany. Retrieved
July 30, 2020, from
https://www.dw.com/es/johnny-araya-abandona-la-segunda-vuelta-en-las-elecciones-presidenciales-de-costa-rica/a-17478248
Sequeira, A., &
Chinchilla, S. (2019, July 31). Jonathan Prendas defiende noticia
falsa sobre alza del IVA en sitio web ligado a él. San José, Costa
Rica. Retrieved July 30, 2020, from
https://www.nacion.com/el-pais/politica/jonathan-prendas-defiende-noticia-falsa-sobre-alza/REH5KMKUOJC43HKI6HOFPUTVYE/story/
Connecting to a Bigger Picture by Jonathan Acuña on Scribd
Post a Comment