Competency-Based
Assessment
Some thoughts
By Prof. Jonathan
Acuña Solano
Saturday, October 24,
2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 198
“In
traditional classrooms, teachers use a variety of assessment methods to measure
student knowledge of a particular skill or concept. While this knowledge is important,
in competency based classrooms, an understanding of content is insufficient” (Assessment Methods, n.d.) . Students must
demonstrate that they are able to comprehend and use theoretical concepts
explained to them on specific tasks such as case studies, essays, journals, observations,
oral presentations, portfolios, simulations, tests, and so on. As stated by
Laureate Education, “assessment must also measure a student’s ability to
demonstrate and apply the knowledge to real world experiences” (Assessment Methods, n.d.) .
In
a previous post, a competency on literary analysis based on the reader response
was provided. Students taking a course such as Literary Criticism, where they have
to study different approaches to get a better understanding of literary pieces,
are exposed to a great array of approaches used in literature to make sense of literary
creations. The ultimate idea behind this course on Literary Criticism dealing with
analyses and approaches is to train learners to read literature for their own
enjoyment, comprehend it better for further explanations, and become prepared
to be using these methods for literary analysis when they become the language
instructors in a school or university.
Antecedent – Behavior – Condition
Competency Formulation
|
A =
Using the Reader Response way of literary interpretation,
|
B =
Learners will be able to analyze the poem A
Dialogue Between the Soul and the Body by Andrew Marvell
|
C =
by providing their personal points of view in an APA-format essay that must
include an introduction, three developmental paragraphs, and a conclusion
|
As it
can be seen here, the literary competency above is based on the antecedent, behavior,
condition method. It is rather self-explanatory, but what really matter here is
how this competency is going to be measured to guarantee that learners can
prove the mastery of how the Reader Response rationale for literary analysis is
used.
As it can also be seen in the
formulation of the competency for a Literary Criticism course, an essay is a
good way to test student competency development. “Essays allow students to
demonstrate knowledge of competencies, communication skills, and analytical
skills through writing” (Laureate Education, 2013) . According to the
formulation of the learning outcome phrased as a competence, learners need to demonstrate
mastery in the production of APA-format essays. Essays do imply the planning of
writing to meet communication standards to make one’s point clear to a reader,
and they also imply the deeper analysis of literary productions based on a very
specific literary approach such as the Reader Response or any other that can be
studied in a course like this.
A literary competency like the one
outlined above does include some degree of challenge in its implementation. To
start with, the instructor must be certain that learners are fully acquainted
with the writing of essays, its structure, its implications in citing sources,
the APA format, etc. This is something that needs to be tested prior having students
produce an essay based on a competency-based learning outcome. The writing of an
essay is a sub-skill in this competency that the instructor must ensure for its
success, and a way of testing learner understanding of APA writing is to have some
writing task to verify comprehension. In addition to essay writing, the correct
application of the literary approach has to be also tested, practiced, scaffolded,
and reviewed as many times as necessary before a student is sent to write a paper.
If by any chance the learner fails to understand how a given literary approach
is used, the product that is going be produced is far away from the
demonstration of the mastery of a given concept. Once again, the monitoring and
observation of learners while applying the approach in in-class literary
analyses is crucial.
As stated by Laureate Education (2013),
we teachers must “measure mastery of skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes
students need to display in a content area, profession, field, or workplace.” If
all these is not met, we are somehow going back to just the traditional way of summatively
assessing students by providing them with a grade that does not necessarily
show proof of mastery of a concept. Instructors must “assess student ability to
demonstrate a competency rather than just know it” (Laureate
Education, Inc., 2013) .
References
References
Assessment Methods. (n.d.).
Retrieved from Faculty Development: https://lnps.
elearning.laureate.net/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_84966_1&content_id=_142444_1&mode=reset
Laureate Education, I. (2013). Assessment Methods. Retrieved
from Laureate
Faculty
Development: https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/bbcswebdav/
institution/LPS1/FD/APSK/LPS1.FDEV.APSK.CBLE.EN.ON.V1.MASTER/
readings/LNPS_APSK_CBLE_EN_Unit03_competencyBased
Assessment.pdf
Laureate Education, Inc. (2013). Best Practices for
Designing Learning
Competencies. Retrieved from Faculty Development:
https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/bbcswebdav/institution/LPS1/FD/
APSK/LPS1.FDEV.APSK.CBLE.EN.ON.V1.MASTER/readings/
LNPS_APSK_CBLE_EN_Unit02_bestPracticesForDesigningLearning
Competencies.pdf
Post a Comment