skip to main | skip to sidebar
Reflective Online Teaching
My Personal Site for Reflective Teaching
RSS
    Jonathan Acuña Solano, Post Author
    Contact Email: jonacuso@gmail.com

Social Bookmarking: Why to Do it

#LTTO, Hybrid and Blended Learning, Online Teaching Practices 4 comments



Managing Online Resources
Social Bookmarking: Why to Do it

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Sunday, November 8, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 207

          Though I had been keeping Web sites that I found and considered useful in an email folder, I was fortunately introduced to social bookmarking about 8 years ago when I was taking a course with the University of Oregon (UO). As a way to keep track of all those great Webpages one gets to run into while browsing for information for my language courses and for one’s research papers, our UO instructors asked us to open an account at http://www.delicious.com. Later on, a colleague of mine, Stephen Thergesen, an English teacher based in Denver, Colorado, introduced me to http://www.paper.li, and by means of that site I was able to “fatten” my Delicious account with more useful sites for my teaching, research interests, and life-long learning.


          I must confess that I have somehow neglected my Delicious account because I found, thanks to Stephen Thergesen –again-, another much more dynamic site to keep track of my Internet findings: http://www.scoop.it. But anyhow, those sites are now part of my daily professional life and sharing with my college students. And how have I been using them with my university students? Let me share a couple of ideas with you:

1
Bookmarking in language classes
·         To list webpages for language practice aiming at working with vocabulary or grammar structures
·         To have a list of monolingual dictionaries and thesaurus for writing tasks or reading exercises
2
Bookmarking in content classes
·         To keep track of webpages for research purposes: speeches, papers, WebQuests, etc.
·         To keep record of pages that can be eventually used in one’s teaching practicum

          There are more benefits than challenges in terms of encouraging students to sign up for a bookmarking account. In terms of educational benefits, students will take advantage of social bookmarking by keeping a record of pages they can really profit from. Anything they get to find online and that they consider useful for their future professional practicum and later on practice, it is a plus for all students. It will be up to them to keep on adding more and more sites to their bookmarks to keep themselves current and updated with the new trends in their fields.

          The challenge of keeping a social bookmarking account is not connected to an instructor, but it is more linked to the students. As a language teacher I am much into sharing stuff I find on my regular browsing through the Web and enjoy sparing those sites with my pupils, but it is in the end the learners’ decision to keep on feeding their bookmarks and sharing them with their peers. And the only way to mitigate that is by having students regularly share their findings in a link-sharing section that might be curated by all learners as a wiki.



Sunday, November 08, 2015



Reflection: Comparing Experiences with Other Faculty Members at a Different Laureate University

#LTTO, Hybrid and Blended Learning, Teaching Practices 0 comments


Reflection: Comparing Experiences with Other Faculty Members at a Different Laureate University

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Saturday, November 7, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 206

          By comparing my online, hybrid, blended learning/teaching experiences with other colleagues, I feel honored to share a bit of what I have gotten to know with them. Though I cannot consider myself a fully-developed online instructor, my empirical work for more than seven years so far is giving me a different standpoint in terms of training and my LoTi (Levels of Technology Integration) level (LOTI Levels of Technology Integration, n.d.). I have –several times- suggested colleagues of mine and other faculty members to get to know the LoTi Profiles to self-evaluate themselves and to get to know a bit more of their students. Just because our student seem to be 21st Century learners, it does not really mean they are at that technological level to embark themselves into online learning.

          When I compare my experiences with other members of this Laureate Certificate, I get to see how several partners have already worked somehow or have gained extensive experience at an online level with university students. It looks like, from my standpoint, that their learners and mine are not that different though we live in very contrasting parts of the world. Yet our pupils’ willingness to continue building up their knowledge is a characteristic all of them share, whether that is in a traditional classroom setting or in virtual learning environment. And their desire to keep on learning deeply is what fuels us to continue training ourselves a bit more to be better prepared and equipped to face the challenges of online teaching scenarios, asynchronous or synchronously.


          All of us Laureate Faculty Members from various universities scattered all across the globe have valued the important teachings we have been provided throughout the Certificate so far with all of our Instructors, who have extended their hand to give us the guidance needed to complete tasks though we face trouble with meeting deadlines. Somehow we may say that our online instructors have become role models to copy and to improve; as we had to discover our teaching style in a traditional four-walled classroom, we also must explore our online, hybrid, or blended teaching style. And that exploration through our instructors has been, for many of us, one of the most important aspects of the Certificate; we have realized how our online instructors behave with class members, how they provide us with timely feedback and assistance, and how they have helped us to come all this way in our learning and professional development. Online teaching is not what we think of from afar; once one is in a virtual classroom it is the ripe time to really uncover what virtual teaching is all about.

          This time around, all of us have come to witness the importance of synchronous tools to stay in touch with our learners. It would have been nice, as a final remark, that we could have had the chance to meet with Certificate instructors to also see how a valuable tool to secure one’s social presence and teaching presence can be effectively used. Laureate’s Certificates are asynchronously delivered due to the great array of time zones in which fellow faculty members live in and work on. The online experience may have been radically different if we had also been exposed to synchronous communication tools.

References


LOTI Levels of Technology Integration. (n.d.). Retrieved from Educational Origami: http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/LOTI




Saturday, November 07, 2015



Synchronous Conversation, A Reflection

#LTTO, Hybrid and Blended Learning, LOTI Profile 0 comments



Synchronous Conversation,
A Reflection

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Saturday, November 7, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 205

          When asked about the successes and challenges I experienced during the Laureate Faculty Development’s Hybrid and Blended Learning Certificate training, I must confess that there are more successes than any other thing. Even today my personal satisfaction with this instructional model continues to be fruitful and very successful, I continue to believe that this educational model remains incredibly interesting and a field that needs to be researched much more. On the other hand, when I dropped in the certificate online classes, lots of the data proposed to us participants were not new to me. I had been trying out some sort of online learning with my language students at Universidad Latina ever since I studied through the Distant Education Program, at the English Language Institute, University of Oregon. What the Laureate certificate has given me is the rationale and theory I was lacking to ground my teaching practices today much more effectively and soundly.


          Through this certificate I expanded and continue expanding lots of the basic concepts proposed by my two instructors at the University of Oregon, Sandra Jeffs and Deborah Healy, who guided my first steps into this virtual learning/teaching journey. Because of these two professors I got confronted with the LoTi Assessment (LOTI Levels of Technology Integration, n.d.), and then –as a language instructor- I made the decision to become much better in the use of technology. Due to my in-depth analysis of LoTi and my former training with the University of Oregon and with a Language Fellow, Skye McLeod, appointed to Costa Rica by the Department of State of the US, I started carrying out empirical blended language teaching and learning for my students at the university by creating several Web pages with content for my courses, which ended up being open 24/7 and beyond the course time boundaries.

LoTi Diagram (LOTI Levels of Technology Integration, n.d.)

          When introduced to the Universidad Latina’s Moodle platform, I was really quick in starting to use all possible tools provided by the system. I have come to a point in my professional development and practice in which my courses are some sort of a “flipped classroom” where we come to class to discuss projects and results, but via online I provide whatever I consider necessary for them to complete learning tasks and fulfil the learning outcomes that have been traced per each week of work. The experience has been quite satisfactory and fulfilling, too. I have also learned lots from my empirical attempts and from my students who have been willing to be guided and taught in this way. This has been the greatest achievement or success with my content and language courses at the university. And the Laureate Certificate has given me a much wider understanding of what initiated almost eight years ago, back in January 2008.

          While working on one of the modules of the certificate, to have us experience what it meant to be part of synchronous communication, we were asked to get together online despite our location on the planet or our time zone. In terms of the tool used for a synchronous meeting with some of my online partners in the certificate, I suggested using AnyMeeting.Com, a free virtual classroom service that can hold up to 100 participants at the same time. As for its advantages, AnyMeeting.Com allows you to create a virtual meeting room where the host can send as many invitations as there are participants. Anyone can join the classroom and be able to be seen by other participants (as long as they have their webcam on); meeting guests are able to chat while the host is talking (There is a small place to chat and post questions for the speaker.); and anyone can be promoted to be a speaker and to share from videos to documents with the rest of the partners. Its only two drawbacks in its free version is that AnyMeeting.Com has advertisements on the right side of the meeting room (since it is sponsored to be used freely by anyone) and does not allow you to record the meeting (a feature for paying users). But aside from that, there are no issues to complain about. It will remind participants via email, one day before the meeting starts that they have to sign into the classroom without having to sign in for an account.
         
          “Synchronous learning environments support learning and teaching and offer students and teachers with multiple ways of interacting, sharing, and the ability to collaborate and ask questions in real-time through synchronous learning technologies” (Higley, n.d.). Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) should not be the exception to become a way to propitiate deep learning experiences to our students; they should be fair grounds for life-long lasting learning that can become applicable in any hybrid, online or blended teaching scenario, especially when using “synchronous learning technologies” that can potentiate this deep learning we instructors want to see among our learners competencies.

References


Higley, M. (n.d.). Benefits of Synchronous and Asynchronous e-Learning. Retrieved from eLearning Industry: http://elearningindustry.com/benefits-of-synchronous-and-asynchronous-e-learning

LOTI Levels of Technology Integration. (n.d.). Retrieved from Educational Origami: http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/LOTI


Saturday, November 07, 2015



Synchronous Tools in Online Learning Scenarios

#LTTO, Online Instruction, online learning, Online Teaching Practices 0 comments


(Smith, 2012, Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication)


Synchronous Tools in Online Learning Scenarios
Online Trends and Advanced Tools

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 204

One of the most inconvenient things that college students have is to find time to get together with partners to develop course projects. Synchronous tools allow learners in a college setting to work together at the same time while in different locations within the same city, country, or afar. “Synchronous communication is any form of live communication that demands all parties involved in a conversation be present at the same time. This forces the conversation to occur when both parties are available and may inconvenience schedules of one or both of the participants” (Smith, 2012). For an online course, synchronous tools provide support for students to discuss, share, and collaborate simultaneously with or without the assistance of a professor. For all these reasons, as an online teacher, it is important to recognize the benefits, challenges, and what is needed on your online course prior to selecting synchronous tools. A couple of synchronous tools I have often used and encourage students to use are: Google Docs along with Google Talk and AnyMeeting.

When one gets to talk about the benefits we can get out of Google Docs, it is important to highlight how it can be synchronously effective for learners. What if students need to get together for a project? Do you –as an instructor- want them to get together? If the answer is yes, how about having them get together virtually? Google Docs, no matter what you are developing (a report, equations, a presentation, etc.), all of that can be done on it. 1) Students can develop presentation jointly even while having a conversation simultaneously about what needs to be included or excluded. 2) Learners can be working on a report, e.g., and in different parts of it synchronously and sharing feedback for one another either while talking or chatting. And 3) What about brainstorming? It can be a great place to share ideas and keep a record of them while conversing or chatting at the same time. Google Docs is a great synchronous tool to be implemented and used with or among students. “Anyone who is in the market for word processing software should take a look at Google Docs. Some may be uncomfortable relying on web-based software. However, with collaboration tools and online storage, Google Docs will appeal to Word users who work on multiple computers or who collaborate with others” (Marshall, n.d.), and who lack time to get together with peers to plan presentations, write reports, and so on.

Though Google Docs along with Google Talk is a great tool, AnyMeeting.Com is a free online application when more than two people need to work simultaneously. Google Docs is a great tool to work on a one to one basis, but if more people need to collaborate, AnyMeeting is a better option. “Users can host an unlimited number of webinars, with up to 200 users per session. It is easy to easy to use, so even first-time hosts will be able to easily find their way around the software” (Warren, n.d.). As a teacher then, a) I can create a virtual classroom to meet with three or more students with or without the use of webcams, something Skype cannot do unless you pay for that service. b) I can mute or promote speakers so they can take control of the class in case I want them to voice opinions or comment. c) I can even show them anything I have on my computer desktop including videos that they can actually see and hear. If students are taught to use tools like this, life can go on though they may be miles apart or lacking the time to commute to have a conversation about a college project.

Synchronous tools are indeed important to be shared and promoted among students who cannot get together due to their tight schedules. Tools like Google Docs and AnyMeeting favor cooperative learning among learners who have a difficulty in moving from one place to another. And even if they may be out of the country, they can join meetings and participate actively. And what if the instructor needs to be away, too? He can create a virtual classroom for all of them to continue with instruction and fostering learning.

References


Marshall, J. (n.d.). Google Docs Online Word Processing Software. Retrieved from About.Com: http://wordprocessing.about.com/od/choosingsoftware/gr/writerly.htm
Smith, R. (2012, May 23). Synchronous vs Asynchronous Communication and why it matters to you as a doctor. Retrieved from iMedicalApps: http://www.imedicalapps.com/2012/05/synchronous-asynchronous-communication/
Warren, G. (n.d.). AnyMeeting Review - Free Web Conferencing Tool. Retrieved from About.Com: http://mobileoffice.about.com/od/conferencing-and-collaboration/fr/freebinar-review.htm




Wednesday, November 04, 2015



Community of Practice: An Asynchronous Tools Reflection

#LTTO, Hybrid and Blended Learning, VLE, VLEs 0 comments


Community of Practice
An Asynchronous Tools Reflection

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Sunday, November 1, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 203

          As one explores asynchronous tools for one’s online course, it is way essential to evaluate how these tools can affect the learning environment one is intending to create for one’s class. As an online or blended instructor, it is necessary to think of the following: the most challenging feature an asynchronous tool can have, the greatest benefit one and one’s class can get out of it, and any question one may have regarding the use of asynchronous tools prior its launching in a course one is teaching.


·         What do you feel is the most challenging feature of asynchronous tools?

When confronted with trying to give an answer to this question, I can barely think of an appropriate answer. The point I am trying to make in terms of challenges can be directly connected to the instructor or to the learner. At the beginning the neophyte teacher can find him/herself in a dead-on street if help is not asked from some experienced users of the tool(s) s/he wants to use in his/her online or hybrid course. As soon as this shocking experience is over and expertise and confidence are gained, the instructor is even ready to help students use the desired tool.

To put it simple, teachers can find it difficult at the beginning, but as soon as they get the knack of how something is used, they are on the go. As for students, who are more technologically oriented, the transition to start using a new tool can be just a matter of a short lapse. However, do bear in mind that there may be learners who are not digital natives and who need extra coaching to use the tool properly.


·         What do you feel is the greatest benefit of these tools?

Asynchronous tools benefit today’s learners beyond what can be really measured. Firstly, tools like this provide a certain kind of freedom that working students cannot experienced due to their tight schedules, mainly connected to their jobs. With asynchronous tools, they can find some room in their busy agendas to do what is requested in the course chronogram. Secondly, it terms of m-Learning, these tools offer them the chance of working on their assignments while commuting back and forth from home to work. With their mobile devices they are also aligned with the course content and with the teacher’s feedback and new materials.

With tools like this, we need to stop being skeptical that blended and mobile learning cannot be ideal ways of earning a degree by thousands of individuals on this planet. Asynchronous tools provided by the course instructor is the last ingredient needed to help all these students to get a university degree or additional training for their working life. After being in this position before as a student in an online environment attaining two different associate degrees as a complement to my current job in education, I am certain the it is possible to teach asynchronously and learn deeply in this particular educational setting.



·         What questions do you still have about using asynchronous tools in your online course?

When asked the above question, I must admit that I have already overcome my initial skepticism of online, hybrid, and blended learning. I feel certain that education can be attained in different ways, and that our technological societies and citizens are looking for extra alternatives that can allow them to work, have a family, enjoy their social life, and also get a degree in a higher education institution.


The use of all these asynchronous tools connected to an LMS platform can be the long-awaited answer that many individual in our home countries have been waiting for. Why to stop learning and learners who are craving to continue developing themselves professionally, if online, hybrid, and blended education can satisfy the education needs that many individuals have today.


Sunday, November 01, 2015



Asynchronous Tools in Online/Hybrid Teaching

#LTTO, Asynchronous Tools, Hybrid and Blended Learning 0 comments


Asynchronous Tools in Online/Hybrid Teaching

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 202

As pointed out by Laureate Education, Inc. (2013), “Asynchronous tools are tools that can be used by different people, at different places, at different times to contribute to a shared discussion, document, or activity.” And these asynchronous tools can indeed be utilized not only for communication but also for collaboration. And as professionals, we are likely to use some asynchronous tools on our jobs; we send e-mail and text messages on a regular basis; we get to watch YouTube, Vimeo, or TeacherTube videos to find appropriate material for our classes, and so on. But one tool that has been there long to signal as a great tool is the use of blogs for educational purposes.

As language teaching professional, I have created numerous blogs to satisfy student learning needs and to plan teacher-led instruction for my current or even future students. Furthermore, after taking a course on how to use case studies as part of one’s instruction in class, I decided to create a blog for one of my course where I wanted my students to be exposed to this learning theory and to really get to use their critical thinking skill beyond the boundaries of our books and classroom; I wanted to leave my students with something that could perfectly be used in their professional practicum as well as in their day-to-day lives: How to use case studies.


Since “blogs can be used by instructors or students as a way to share information and comment on the contributions of others” (Laureate Education, 2013), my initial goal was to create a space that asynchronously linked to class and where students could feel free to drop by any time they wished. This blog, which I christened BIN-10 –the course code for Oral Communication and Pronunciation III-, intends to gap the bridge between what is studied in my language class and the number of credits it has. That is, I really wanted my learners to stick to the number of hours of independent study that is linked to those credits by having this blog and by using a number of Moodle tools present in the university’s LMS.

Blog Address: http://bin-10.blogspot.com/
Case Study URL: http://bin-10.blogspot.com/search/label/Case%203

The sample case I wrote for my students based on course content and objectives, along with their textbook content and scope and sequence is CASE #3: Forgetfulness and Types of Memory, which is aligned with the course unit on memory. On this page, learners will find two different activities for them to perform: One that intends to make students reflect on the kind of personality they have linked to their memory capabilities, and one that has students critically reflect on a situation where a person, in some sort of dilemma or turning point, needs to be given assertive answers to questions surrounding his/her present psychological or physical well-being. Additionally, they are provided with a case study form to fill in and bring to class to further discuss the situation with partners and teacher.

As part of my online/hybrid teaching, these collections of case studies have worked quite nicely with students though they get some trouble with the first one. As soon as they are familiarized with the procedure for analysis, they usually come up with great and practical solutions for the cases provided. And due to the fact that learners must give short speeches where they are confronted with current events, social and educational issues, and even ethical decisions, the rationale behind the use of case studies permeates their work allowing them to design and develop more quality presentations with lots of reflection and critical thinking.

Reference



Laureate Education, I. (2013). Asynchronous Tools. Retrieved from Laureate Faculty Development.



Saturday, October 31, 2015



Self-Regulation of Learning

Competency-Based Learning, Mindfulness, Teaching Practices 0 comments


Self-Regulation of Learning

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 201

          “Self-Regulation is the ability to monitor and control our own behavior, emotions, or thoughts, altering them in accordance with the demands of the situation” (Cook & Cook, 2014). Self-regulation of one’s learning is an important step all students must take to take control of their own development of their knowledge. As Cook & Cook (2014) state, our pupils must be able to control their “behavior, emotions, and thoughts” to profit from instruction, research, homework, assignments, presentations, projects, and the like. As it can be seen, self-regulation plays an important part in one’s learning letting us take control of it mindfully.

          How can I have my learners profit from self-regulation when being in a competency-based setting? Well, self-regulation “includes the abilities to inhibit first responses, to resist interference from irrelevant stimulation, and to persist on relevant tasks even when we don’t enjoy them” (Cook & Cook, 2014). When learners are being transitioned to a competency-based course, they will be challenged by the instructor to take control of their learning, and this will imply that they need to “inhibit first responses” such as “I don’t like this,” “This is not what I want from a course,” or “What’s the point in doing things in this way?” If students were taught with more traditional ways of learning where a grade was more important than learning, resistance to change will be faced. When moving to work independently online or with electronic materials, learners must cope with the “interference from irrelevant stimulation” such as the one coming from their social media. And needless to mention that importance of persisting on “relevant tasks” though they may not like them much or at all. Learning is fun, but there are students who do not find any taste in sampling the milk of being competent.


          Being a bit mindful concerning my own learning experiences, especially when dealing with a master’s program on education (which I recently finished), the role of self-regulation was transcendental to achieve success. Comprehending that self-regulation “is the method or procedure that learners use to manage and organize their thoughts and convert them into skills used for learning” (Self-Regulation, n.d.), as a learner I saw myself managing and organizing my thoughts to deal with all the information I was being provided and the amount of projects that needed to be submitted. Mindfully, I tried to convert all those pieces of information into skills I wanted to use to learn the novelties in education and language learning. Was I successful? Sure! But self-regulation of learning has also made me think whether my partners were into regulating their learning processes.

          Having been there, where my university students are right now, craving for knowledge and, most importantly, developing competencies they can use at work, what am I to do to help them? Somehow I want to follow Zimmerman’s ideas (1990) regarding self-regulation in learning: use of self-regulated learning strategies, responsiveness to self-oriented feedback about learning effectiveness, and interdependent motivational processes. “Self-regulated students select and use self-regulated learning strategies to achieve desired academic outcomes on the basis of feedback about learning effectiveness and skill” (Zimmerman, 1990). If my students can become self-regulated, they can self-discover and use learning strategies that can help them achieve their academic goals for a course or a whole major. If my students can turn into self-regulated learners, they can then provide themselves –mindfully speaking- self-oriented feedback about how effective they are with their own learning, making them really take control of their construction of of their own knowledge. And if my pupils can really become self-regulated learners, they can guide or lead their interdependent motivational processes to get to really develop competencies that can really help them develop their academic life and eventually their competent professional life.

          “Because theories of self-regulated learning seek to explain students’ personal initiative in acquiring knowledge and skill, they all treat students’ motivational processes as interdependent with learning processes” (Zimmerman, 1990). Educators, faculty members, teachers in general must look for ways to incentivate the use of these student strategies to become mindful deep learners who can really achieve their academic goals and who can become really competent professionals. Before an instructor decides to start using a competency-based course program, it is a good idea that s/he thinks of the following: “Self-regulation is a social enterprise that involves a learner and a knowledgeable individual who can guide the learner through the process of acquiring self-regulatory skills” (Bembenutty, White, & Vélez, 2015). If an instructor is not ready yet to venture into Comptency-Based Learning, which requires self-regulation from the learner and the instructor, it is a good idea to become more confident before the launching of a class setting where students will be in control of their learning and development of competences.

References


Bembenutty, H., White, M., & Vélez, M. (2015). Developing Self-Regulation of Learning and Teaching Skills Among Teacher Candidates. New York: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
Cook, J., & Cook, G. (2014, April 30). Self-Regulation. Retrieved from Education.Com: http://www.education.com/reference/article/self-regulation-development-skill/
Self-Regulation. (n.d.). Retrieved from University of Nebraska at Lincoln: http://cehs.unl.edu/secd/self-regulation/
Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.






Sunday, October 25, 2015



Teaching Students with Varying Levels of Competency

Competency-Based Learning, Teaching Practices 0 comments


Teaching Students with Varying Levels of Competency

By Prof. Jonathan Acuña Solano
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 200

          “Teachers in competency based classrooms must recognize that students enter at various levels of competency and acquire knowledge at different rates” (Blog 4: Teaching Students with Varying Levels of Competency, n.d.). No single human being is to learn the very same way in which a peer does; all of us have different ways of learning and of processing information provided in a classroom setting. The way the knowledge is grasped and consequently used in learning tasks varies from individual to individual. Faculty members “must be committed to facilitating learning at all levels by utilizing strategies to support learning of individual students without lowering expectations” (Blog 4: Teaching Students with Varying Levels of Competency, n.d.).

          To make competency-based instruction work within one’s classroom, strategies must be used. “In competency-based settings, teachers are encouraged to minimize direct instruction and focus on facilitating student learning” (Laureate Education, Inc., 2013). And the facilitation of student learning is definitely done by means of strategies that need to be carefully envisioned and understood by the instructor. Let’s take the case of the Literary Criticism class where the following competency for literary analysis is meant to be met by learners:

Antecedent – Behavior – Condition Competency Formulation
A = Using the Reader Response way of literary interpretation,
B = Learners will be able to analyze the poem A Dialogue Between the Soul and the Body by Andrew Marvell
C = by providing their personal interpretations regarding emotions, feelings and ideas discussed by the poet in an APA-format essay that must include an introduction, three developmental paragraphs, and a conclusion

What strategies can be used to help learners become competent literary analysts within the Reader Response approach connected to Jacques Lacan’s mirror metaphor for literature?


          The provision of a “stimulating environment” for learning and the development of competencies is needed. The instructor must be able to create the right conditions to foster deep learning among students. In addition, the teacher has to “establish an environment that encourages exploration and allows student to take risks, make mistakes, and find ways to improve their own learning” (Laureate Education, Inc., 2013). Learners are moved from a mere receptive state of information to a real engagement in the construction of their own knowledge and competencies. In my Literary Criticism course at the university, my students are provided with learning tasks that move them beyond the classroom setting with bits of online independent learning and research and project-based learning works whose end product is the production of the essay stated in the competency formulation.

          The selection of appropriate learning resources is another strategy to be used in competency-based learning settings. The idea behind the selection of resources aligns with the idea that “teachers must support students as they work to acquire skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes that can be transferred to a higher level of education and/or the workplace” (Laureate Education, Inc., 2013). After the careful evaluation of resources that can help learners develop their research projects in the Literary Criticism class, they are provided with handouts, diagrams, case studies, worksheets, videos, demonstration, and essays by means of the university’s Moodle platform. The idea is then to provide them with the minimum required to carry out a learning tasks and prompt them into the search of new information on their own; this is a simple way to promote independent and long-lasting learning that can eventually be used in their future or current jobs.

          If possible, the personalization of learning is a requisite for competency-based education. This strategy allows the instructor to “provide tasks that are relevant and connected to the students’ lives and the work they will do in the future” (Laureate Education, Inc., 2013). In my literature class, this means that my learners are provided with small-scale projects that are relevant for literary comprehension and analysis linked to their personal and future professional lives as language instructors. Professors using this strategy must also comprehend that all pupils have “unique skills, backgrounds, and interests” (Laureate Education, Inc., 2013). The exploitation of learners’ skills, backgrounds, and interests is a priority in literary analyses because it helps them to achieve goals and competencies in their own personal way; learning cannot be homogenized in any sense since every individual construct knowledge differently.

          To concluded, any educator transitioning from mere traditional teaching/learning scenarios must keep this idea in their minds all the time: “The Competency-based education (CBE) approach allows students to advance based on their ability to master a skill or competency at their own pace regardless of environment” (Competency-Based Education (CBE), n.d.). CBE allows instructors to create more engaging learning tasks aligned with competences that are required from students when they become part of the labor force in their countries or overseas. And as Educase puts it, “this method is tailored to meet different learning abilities and can lead to more efficient student outcomes” (Competency-Based Education (CBE), n.d.) if used correctly. The results of the teaching/learning process can be more rewarding than simply getting a good mark on a test or term paper.


References


Blog 4: Teaching Students with Varying Levels of Competency. (n.d.). Retrieved from Laureate Faculty Development: https://lnps.elearning.laureate.net/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_84966_1&content_id=_142450_1&mode=reset

Competency-Based Education (CBE). (n.d.). Retrieved from Educase.Com: http://www.educause.edu/library/competency-based-education-cbe

Laureate Education, Inc. (2013). Supporting Student Learning in Competency Based Settings. Laureate International Universities.




Sunday, October 25, 2015



Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

    Reflective Online Teaching

    Reflective Online Teaching
    Let's learn together

    Visitors

    Costa Rica

    Costa Rica
    My Home Country

    TESOL Certified Instructor

    TESOL Certified Instructor

    Certified Virtual Instructor

    Certified Virtual Instructor

    PD Talks & NCTE-Costa Rica

    PD Talks & NCTE-Costa Rica

    Copyscape

    Protected by Copyscape

    Labels

    • #EdChat (8)
    • #LTTO (14)
    • A1 Learners (1)
    • ABLA (9)
    • Academic Research (9)
    • ADDIE Model (7)
    • Afro-Caribbean Lore (1)
    • Alexander Luria (5)
    • Anansi (1)
    • Andragogy (5)
    • Andy Curtis (1)
    • Apps for Education (1)
    • Assessment (9)
    • Assessment Practices (3)
    • ASSURE (1)
    • Asynchronous Tools (2)
    • Aural/oral skills (1)
    • autonomous learning (1)
    • Barthesian Analysis (5)
    • Behavior (1)
    • Bettelheim (1)
    • Biblical Text Analysis (1)
    • Big Data (6)
    • Blended Learning (1)
    • BlendIt Course (8)
    • Bloom's Taxonomy (5)
    • BNCs (9)
    • Book Critique (2)
    • Book of Job (1)
    • Bookmarking Sites (1)
    • Case Study (4)
    • CEF (2)
    • Classroom Management (2)
    • Cloud Reader (1)
    • Coaching in Teacher Classroom Observation (2)
    • Code of Ethics (1)
    • Communicating about Uncertainty (1)
    • Community of Practice (8)
    • Competency-Based Learning (9)
    • Content Assimilation (1)
    • Content Design (1)
    • CoP (2)
    • Course Project (2)
    • critical skills (1)
    • Critical Thinking Skills (2)
    • Culture (11)
    • Culture Framework (2)
    • Culture Teaching (8)
    • Curriculum Design (2)
    • Curriculum Development (5)
    • Data Science (7)
    • Data-Driven Teaching (5)
    • DDT (1)
    • Deductive Grammar Instruction (2)
    • Deontology (1)
    • Developmental Feedback (1)
    • Diane Larsen-Freeman (1)
    • Didactics (4)
    • Distance Education (2)
    • E-Portfolios (1)
    • Education and Learning (34)
    • Education Technologies (9)
    • Educational Philosophies (1)
    • EFL/ESL Activities (1)
    • Electracy (1)
    • ELF (1)
    • ELL (16)
    • ELL. ELT (1)
    • ELT (35)
    • ELT Conference (1)
    • English Grammar (3)
    • English Teaching (1)
    • Enkidu (1)
    • Eric Mazur (1)
    • ESP (2)
    • Ethical Judgments (1)
    • Ethics (37)
    • Ethics Analysis (1)
    • Etiological Storytelling (1)
    • Evaluation (1)
    • Executives' School (9)
    • Ezekiel (1)
    • Fairy Tales (2)
    • Feedback (5)
    • Flipped Classroom (1)
    • Flipped Learning (1)
    • Formative Assessment (1)
    • Forums (1)
    • Frankenstein (1)
    • Freudian Analysis (3)
    • From theory to practice (2)
    • Future for Education? (2)
    • Global Competence (1)
    • Global Ethics (7)
    • Grading Ranges (1)
    • Grammar (3)
    • Guest Author (1)
    • Guided Practice (2)
    • H. G. Wells (1)
    • H.P. Lovecraft (3)
    • Haiku (1)
    • HD Brown (1)
    • Higher Education (49)
    • History (2)
    • Homerton College Cambridge Course (2)
    • Hootcourse (1)
    • Human Rights (1)
    • Hybrid and Blended Learning (61)
    • Hybrid In-person Teaching (1)
    • Idioms (1)
    • Iktomi (1)
    • Independent Practice (1)
    • Inductive Grammar Instruction (2)
    • infographic (1)
    • Instructional Design (3)
    • Integration of Technology into Teaching (10)
    • Interventions in ELL (1)
    • Isaac Asimov (1)
    • Jacque Lacan (1)
    • Jacques de Molay (1)
    • James Thurber (1)
    • Japanese Folklore (1)
    • Jeremiah (1)
    • JotForm (1)
    • Jungian Analysis (4)
    • Kahlil Gibran (2)
    • Kathleen M. Bailey (1)
    • Kirkpatrick Model (1)
    • Knight Templars (1)
    • Lacanian Analysis (4)
    • Language Competences (1)
    • Language Learning (13)
    • Language Teaching (6)
    • Laureate Course Module 3 Teaching with Technology (19)
    • Laureate Educator (4)
    • Laureate Educator in the XXI Century (2)
    • Laureate Educator-Week 1 (1)
    • Laureate Educator-Week 2 (1)
    • Laureate Educator-Week 3 (1)
    • Leadership (9)
    • learner autonomy (1)
    • Learning (8)
    • Learning Activities (1)
    • Learning Objectives (2)
    • Learning Preferences (1)
    • Learning Styles (1)
    • Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Pablo Picasso (1)
    • Lesson Planning (4)
    • Lev Vygotsky (4)
    • Libraries (1)
    • Life is a Dream (1)
    • Life Stories (1)
    • Linguistics (2)
    • Listening (1)
    • Literary Criticism (15)
    • Literature (29)
    • LMS (6)
    • LOTI Profile (5)
    • MakerSpace (1)
    • Marcel Duchamp (4)
    • Mary Shelly (1)
    • Materials Design (1)
    • Meaning of Justice (1)
    • Metacognition (2)
    • Metadata (1)
    • Methodology (2)
    • microcelebrities (1)
    • Mind Maps (2)
    • Mindfulness (12)
    • Mixed-Methods Research (4)
    • Modeling in ELT (1)
    • MOOCs (1)
    • Moodle (5)
    • Moral Lesson (1)
    • Motivation (2)
    • Music and Learning (1)
    • Mythology (1)
    • Needs Assessment (3)
    • Netiquette (1)
    • Network Community (1)
    • Nicatesol (1)
    • Nive Events of Instruction (1)
    • Nonviolent Communication (6)
    • Nouns in English (1)
    • Objective Writing (1)
    • OER (1)
    • Online Community (1)
    • Online Instruction (55)
    • online learning (44)
    • Online Learning Programs (1)
    • Online Persona (9)
    • Online Program Design (1)
    • online teaching (4)
    • Online Teaching Approach (1)
    • Online Teaching Practices (71)
    • Oral Assessment (1)
    • Oral Communication (1)
    • Oral Skills (2)
    • Paper.li (1)
    • PBL (1)
    • Pedagogy (2)
    • Pedro Calderón de la Barca (1)
    • Peer Instruction (1)
    • Penny Ur (2)
    • Personal Learning Networks (2)
    • Philosophy (1)
    • Phonemics (4)
    • Phonetics (4)
    • Phonotactics (3)
    • Pilot Programs (1)
    • PLEs and PLNs for Lifelong Learning Competencies Week 1 (1)
    • Poetry (1)
    • Popol Vuh (1)
    • Produsage (1)
    • Produser (1)
    • Professional Competencies (1)
    • Professional Growth (1)
    • Projec-Based Learning (1)
    • Pronunciation (7)
    • Psychology (1)
    • Public Speaking (1)
    • Qualitative Research (4)
    • Quantitative Research (4)
    • Reading (1)
    • Reading and Vocabulary (2)
    • Recruitment (1)
    • Recycling in Education (1)
    • Reflective Journaling (4)
    • Reflective Teaching (55)
    • Research (9)
    • Richard Schmidt (2)
    • Risk Communication (1)
    • Robert Gagné (2)
    • Roland Barthes (2)
    • Rubrics (3)
    • Schema (1)
    • Scoop.it! (1)
    • Second Language Acquisition (4)
    • Secret Societies of the Middle Ages (1)
    • Semiotics (1)
    • Sentence Patterns (1)
    • Short Films (1)
    • Short Stories (4)
    • Sioux Legends (3)
    • Sketchpads (1)
    • SLA (3)
    • Social Media (29)
    • Social Networking in Education (3)
    • Speaking (1)
    • Speaking Scenarios (1)
    • Stephen Krashen (1)
    • Sticky Curriculum (1)
    • Storytelling (1)
    • Strategies for online teaching (1)
    • Student Assessment (1)
    • Student Engagement (1)
    • Student Interest (3)
    • Student Motivation (1)
    • Student Tips (2)
    • Sumerian (1)
    • Summative Assessment (1)
    • Syntax (2)
    • Task-Based Instruction (1)
    • Task-Based Language Teaching (1)
    • TBI (1)
    • TBLT (1)
    • Teacher Development (23)
    • Teacher Feedback (2)
    • Teacher Mentoring (2)
    • Teacher Observation (1)
    • Teacher Training (2)
    • Teaching (47)
    • Teaching Adolescents (1)
    • Teaching ePortfolio (1)
    • Teaching Grammar (2)
    • Teaching Online (9)
    • Teaching Philosophy (4)
    • Teaching Portfolio (1)
    • Teaching Practices (49)
    • Teaching Practicum (22)
    • Teaching Presence (2)
    • Teaching Styles (8)
    • Teaching Tips (9)
    • Teaching With Technology (4)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 1 (1)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 2 (1)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 3 (2)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 4 (4)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 5 (3)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 6 (2)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 7 (3)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 8 (2)
    • Teaching With Technology-Week 9 (1)
    • Tech Tip (5)
    • Technological Assessment (2)
    • Technology Use Tips (1)
    • Templars (1)
    • The Assassins (1)
    • The Book of Proverbs (1)
    • The Butterfly Circus (1)
    • The Cats of Ulthar (1)
    • The Data Scientist (5)
    • The Epic of Gilgamish (1)
    • The Loincloth (1)
    • The New Normal (1)
    • The Noticing Hypothesis (2)
    • The Outsider (1)
    • The Prophet (2)
    • The Time Machine (1)
    • Thomas Keightley (2)
    • Tolkien (1)
    • Trickster (1)
    • UCC (1)
    • Universidad Mariano Gálvez (2)
    • Utilitarianism (1)
    • Videoconferencing Platforms (1)
    • Virtual Classroom Features (1)
    • Virtual Learning Environments (8)
    • Virtual Teaching (5)
    • Virtualized Teaching (1)
    • Visual Literacy (1)
    • VLE (47)
    • VLEs (38)
    • Vocabulary learning (10)
    • WAS (14)
    • Web 2.0 (4)
    • Web search engine options (1)
    • Web Tools (6)
    • WebQuests (1)
    • Wilbert Salgado (4)
    • William Elliot Griffis (1)
    • Working Adult Student (5)
    • writing (2)
    • Writing Skills (1)
    • Zecharia Sitchin (1)
    • ZPD (1)

    Blog Archive

    • ►  2025 (19)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (6)
      • ►  February (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2024 (28)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (5)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (3)
    • ►  2023 (6)
      • ►  September (1)
      • ►  August (5)
    • ►  2022 (1)
      • ►  July (1)
    • ►  2020 (54)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (7)
      • ►  September (11)
      • ►  August (15)
      • ►  July (10)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (5)
    • ►  2019 (13)
      • ►  August (5)
      • ►  July (8)
    • ►  2018 (11)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (7)
      • ►  April (2)
    • ►  2017 (6)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2016 (101)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (7)
      • ►  September (10)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  May (22)
      • ►  April (17)
      • ►  March (21)
      • ►  February (14)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ▼  2015 (53)
      • ▼  November (5)
        • Social Bookmarking: Why to Do it
        • Reflection: Comparing Experiences with Other Facul...
        • Synchronous Conversation, A Reflection
        • Synchronous Tools in Online Learning Scenarios
        • Community of Practice: An Asynchronous Tools Refle...
      • ►  October (13)
        • Asynchronous Tools in Online/Hybrid Teaching
        • Self-Regulation of Learning
        • Teaching Students with Varying Levels of Competency
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  July (8)
      • ►  June (5)
      • ►  May (14)
      • ►  April (4)
    • ►  2014 (40)
      • ►  October (5)
      • ►  September (11)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (8)
      • ►  April (5)
      • ►  February (1)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2013 (46)
      • ►  December (1)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (5)
      • ►  August (6)
      • ►  July (7)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (7)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2012 (17)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (6)
    • ►  2011 (5)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  January (1)
    • ►  2010 (46)
      • ►  December (9)
      • ►  November (14)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (8)
      • ►  January (8)

Copyright © All Rights Reserved. Reflective Online Teaching | Converted into Blogger Templates by Theme Craft